Yes thanks - it will need bootstrapping though
(ghc needs itself to build basically/easily).

So F41 ghc will need to be tagged into the buildroot.
I can open a ticket for that later: after f41 branches.

Well tagging f40 ghc would also be fine or sensible even.
It doesn't have to be latest ghc in rawhide actually.

Though I intend to base/start epel10 ghc on F41 Haskell.

Hi,

Was the above mentionned tagging of the f41 packages in EPEL 10 done ? It seems that right now there is still none of the base haskell packages in EPEL 10.

Sorry forgot to track this bug but I just built ghc and Haskell packages for epel10.0

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-dc0c8ceb93 (EPEL10.0-Haskell) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-dc0c8ceb93

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-dc0c8ceb93 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-dc0c8ceb93

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

FEDORA-EPEL-2025-dc0c8ceb93 (EPEL10.0-Haskell) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.