Bug 2304228 - Review Request: miracle-wm-config - Miracle Window Manager system configuration
Summary: Review Request: miracle-wm-config - Miracle Window Manager system configuration
Keywords:
Status: RELEASE_PENDING
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michel Lind
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2282169
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-08-13 02:12 UTC by Neal Gompa
Modified: 2024-08-13 03:35 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
michel: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Neal Gompa 2024-08-13 02:12:15 UTC
Spec URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/miracle-wm-config.spec
SRPM URL: https://ngompa.fedorapeople.org/for-review/miracle-wm-config-0~git20240812.16888af-1.fc40.src.rpm

Description:
Miracle Window Manager system configuration.

Fedora Account System Username: ngompa

Comment 2 Michel Lind 2024-08-13 03:33:12 UTC
Mostly LGTM, APPROVED with some nits below

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated". 204 files have unknown license.
     Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/michel/src/fedora/reviews/2304228-miracle-wm-
     config/licensecheck.txt
     => it's unclear if this is GPL-3.0-only or GPL-3.0-or-later. Miracle WM itself is GPL-3.0-or-later so that makes sense, but since you are upstream can you list that in either README.md or in file headers?
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/libexec/initial-setup, /usr/lib/sddm
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/libexec/initial-setup
     => looks like this should be owned by `initial-setup` but is not, please file a bug
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 222 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in initial-
     setup-gui-wayland-miraclewm , sddm-wayland-miraclewm
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: miracle-wm-config-0~git.1.20240812.486b4cb-1.fc41.noarch.rpm
          initial-setup-gui-wayland-miraclewm-0~git.1.20240812.486b4cb-1.fc41.noarch.rpm
          sddm-wayland-miraclewm-0~git.1.20240812.486b4cb-1.fc41.noarch.rpm
          miracle-wm-config-0~git.1.20240812.486b4cb-1.fc41.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpm_9x2l3g')]
checks: 32, packages: 4

miracle-wm-config.spec:38: W: unversioned-explicit-provides firstboot(gui-backend)
miracle-wm-config.spec:59: W: unversioned-explicit-provides sddm-greeter-displayserver
sddm-wayland-miraclewm.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
initial-setup-gui-wayland-miraclewm.noarch: W: no-documentation
sddm-wayland-miraclewm.noarch: W: no-documentation
 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings, 16 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 3

sddm-wayland-miraclewm.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
sddm-wayland-miraclewm.noarch: W: no-documentation
initial-setup-gui-wayland-miraclewm.noarch: W: no-documentation
 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings, 9 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://pagure.io/fedora-miracle/miracle-wm-config/archive/486b4cb6c48f85f2334d3808918e4f07fda69c5d/miracle-wm-config-486b4cb6c48f85f2334d3808918e4f07fda69c5d.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : fb562e8136e43762ce307c21153538a5e22becb52080f4a096b18b0f1a15c526
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : fb562e8136e43762ce307c21153538a5e22becb52080f4a096b18b0f1a15c526


Requires
--------
miracle-wm-config (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    desktop-backgrounds-compat
    miracle-wm
    swaybg
    swaylock

initial-setup-gui-wayland-miraclewm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/sh
    initial-setup-gui
    miracle-wm
    xorg-x11-server-Xwayland

sddm-wayland-miraclewm (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    desktop-backgrounds-compat
    layer-shell-qt
    miracle-wm
    sddm



Provides
--------
miracle-wm-config:
    miracle-wm-config

initial-setup-gui-wayland-miraclewm:
    firstboot(gui-backend)
    initial-setup-gui-wayland-miraclewm

sddm-wayland-miraclewm:
    sddm-greeter-displayserver
    sddm-wayland-miraclewm



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2304228
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-aarch64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: C/C++, Python, Perl, R, Java, Haskell, fonts, SugarActivity, PHP, Ocaml
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comment 3 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2024-08-13 03:35:28 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/miracle-wm-config


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.