Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 product line. The current stable release is 4.9. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 230559

Summary:	Permission problems after running unzip
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4	Reporter:	Donald Desjardin <donald.desjardin>
Component:	unzip	Assignee:	Donald Desjardin <donald.desjardin>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.0
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-03-01 20:58:39 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Donald Desjardin 2007-03-01 15:22:15 UTC

Description of problem: unzip leaves file permissions as read-only (400)


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): unzip-5.51-8


How reproducible: every time


Steps to Reproduce:
1. unzip FILE.zip

  
Actual results:
-r--------  1 vobadm ftlinux        12 Aug  7  2005 media.inf
drwxrwxr-x  2 vobadm ftlinux      4096 Aug  7  2005 setup
-r--------  1 vobadm ftlinux 115428425 Aug  7  2005 setup.jar


Expected results:
-rw-rw-r--  1 vobadm ftlinux        12 Aug  7  2005 media.inf
drwxrwxr-x  2 vobadm ftlinux      4096 Aug  7  2005 setup
-rw-rw-r--  1 vobadm ftlinux 115428425 Aug  7  2005 setup.jar


Additional info: I installed a previous version of unzip from my RHES4-U4 CD 
(unzip-5.51-7) and everything works, but if any portion of the RedHat install 
used unzip, then we may hav epotential problems yet unfound.

Comment 1 Andrius Benokraitis 2007-03-01 20:56:38 UTC

*** Bug 230558 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Andrius Benokraitis 2007-03-01 20:58:39 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 230558 ***