Bug 2306900 - Review Request: DFL-utils - DesQ library to obtain system information across DesQ projects
Summary: Review Request: DFL-utils - DesQ library to obtain system information across ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://gitlab.com/desktop-frameworks...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-08-21 18:52 UTC by Steve Cossette
Modified: 2025-08-24 01:22 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-08-24 01:22:40 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Steve Cossette 2024-08-21 18:52:52 UTC
Spec URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/DFL-utils/DFL-utils.spec
SRPM URL: https://farchord.fedorapeople.org/reviews/DFL-utils/DFL-utils-0.2.0-1.fc40.src.rpm

Description:
DesQ library to obtain system information across DesQ projects.

Fedora Account Services Username: farchord

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-08-21 19:55:12 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7932246
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2306900-dfl-utils/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07932246-DFL-utils/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Package Review 2025-08-22 00:45:29 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 3 Steve Cossette 2025-08-24 01:22:40 UTC
Not gonna bother getting this in if noone wants to review this.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.