Bug 2308408 - Review Request: mkdocs-material - Material design theme for MkDocs
Summary: Review Request: mkdocs-material - Material design theme for MkDocs
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michel Lind
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-ma...
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2308406
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-08-28 21:18 UTC by Davide Cavalca
Modified: 2024-08-29 20:52 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-08-29 20:52:44 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
michel: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Davide Cavalca 2024-08-28 21:18:49 UTC
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/mkdocs-material/mkdocs-material.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/mkdocs-material/mkdocs-material-9.5.33-1.fc42.src.rpm

Description:
This package provides a powerful documentation framework on top of MkDocs.

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca

Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2024-08-28 21:19:49 UTC
This package will need to be unretired: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mkdocs-material

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2024-08-28 21:20:44 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7951194
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2308408-mkdocs-material/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07951194-mkdocs-material/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Michel Lind 2024-08-29 02:20:32 UTC
nit: You can just set URL to %forgeurl, it's redundant to specify it twice

Package was unretired and the diff from the previous spec (F35) is reasonable, simplifying the review.

- package builds and installs without errors on rawhide
- test suite is run and all unit tests pass
- latest version of the sotware is packaged
- license matches upstream specification (MIT) and is acceptable for Fedora
- license file is included with %license in %files
- package complies with the Python Packaging Guidelines

Package APPROVED.

===

Recommended post-import python-packagers-sig tasks (use `fedora-sig-onboard onboard pkgname`:

- add @python-packagers-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer

- track package in koschei for all built branches

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2024-08-29 20:48:35 UTC
FEDORA-2024-8fe95b5eb0 (mkdocs-material-9.5.33-1.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-8fe95b5eb0

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2024-08-29 20:52:44 UTC
FEDORA-2024-8fe95b5eb0 (mkdocs-material-9.5.33-1.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.