Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/juliaup.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/juliaup-1.17.4-1.fc40.src.rpm Description: Julia installer and version multiplexer. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe
koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=123105692
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7997618 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2310720-juliaup/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07997618-juliaup/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
The binary /usr/bin/julia conflicts with the julia package. Per [1], *something* needs to be done about this – it can’t just be an implicit conflict. I don’t think I understand this well enough to make a recommendation. I see that upstream recommends uninstalling all other Julias before using juliaup[2], and strongly recommends installing via "curl | bash" rather than using package managers[3] due to unspecified “drawbacks (that we hope to lift in the future).” I’m not sure what to think about all that. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Conflicts/#_binary_name_conflicts [2] https://github.com/julialang/juliaup?tab=readme-ov-file#installation [3] https://github.com/julialang/juliaup?tab=readme-ov-file#software-repositories
You are correct, making the Conflicts explicit is probably a good idea. There's been a few threads about packaged julia in the past. This bug has some context for why packaging it (without bundling the world) is basically impossible: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274270 There was also a discussion on the "devel" list: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/J423CXSMKN525MFGQHHNTNPTSJOKOI4E/
I've added explicit "Conflicts: julia". [fedora-review-service-build]
Created attachment 2047557 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 7997618 to 8034125
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8034125 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2310720-juliaup/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08034125-juliaup/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/ Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.