Bug 2314843 - Review Request: floorp - Web Browser, fork of Firefox
Summary: Review Request: floorp - Web Browser, fork of Firefox
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/Floorp-Projects/Fl...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-09-26 08:41 UTC by Abhishek Girish
Modified: 2025-11-05 02:54 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
abhishekgs.tvm: needinfo-


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Abhishek Girish 2024-09-26 08:41:40 UTC
Spec URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oc_ubQk1KFk6lJONN8gv7knbl4RfY1dM/view?usp=sharing
SRPM URL: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z27P4ZVWZVJxU_waRLCRA5unci1XTdMB/view?usp=sharing
Description: A Browser built for keeping the web Open, Private and Sustainable. Based on Mozilla Firefox.
Fedora Account System Username: thechilledbuffalo

Floorp is a browser, based on Mozilla Firefox, and I wish to make it available to Fedora users through the official package repositories. This is my first package and I will need a sponsor. I am a contributor/collaborator in this project and maintain close contact with the main developer and has acquired their permission to submit this request. 

Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=123988648

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-09-26 08:42:09 UTC
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are:

- You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description
  or any of your comments
- The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS
- The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified
  in the ticket summary


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Abhishek Girish 2024-09-26 09:00:07 UTC
I did provide all the necessary files as requested in the template...

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2024-09-26 13:13:17 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8073821
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2314843-floorp/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08073821-floorp/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- Not a valid SPDX expression 'MPLv2.0'. It seems that you are using the old Fedora license abbreviations. Try `license-fedora2spdx' for converting it to SPDX.
  Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1
- Rpm(s) have files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local: /opt floorp-11.18.1-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm 
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Package Review 2025-10-15 00:45:22 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.