Bug 231524 - PromiscuousTraffic problem seen with BEA Java 1.5.0_08
PromiscuousTraffic problem seen with BEA Java 1.5.0_08
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: java-1.5.0-bea (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Rodney Russ
Depends On: 231899
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-03-08 15:39 EST by Len DiMaggio
Modified: 2012-06-20 12:04 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 12:04:49 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Len DiMaggio 2007-03-08 15:39:50 EST
Description of problem:
The problem described here -
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=PromiscuousTraffic is being seen with
BEA Java 1.5.0_08

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run the sample program included at
2. Observe the problem displayed as servers on both subnets receive the sent
Actual results:
Servers on both subnets receive the sent traffic.

Expected results:
Only one server shold receive the traffic.

Additional info:
Comment 1 Thomas Fitzsimmons 2007-05-02 21:50:59 EDT
Proposing for RHEL-4.6.  We should retest this with R27.2 to see if the problem
still exists.
Comment 2 Ryan Campbell 2007-05-08 15:31:48 EDT
I think the real root of the problem is 231899

IE, the problem is in the OS, not the JVM.
Comment 4 Jiri Pallich 2012-06-20 12:04:49 EDT
Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The release for which you requested us to review is now End of Life. 
Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/

If you would like Red Hat to re-consider your feature request for an active release, please re-open the request via appropriate support channels and provide additional supporting details about the importance of this issue.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.