Spec URL: https://wojnilowicz.fedorapeople.org/rust-rocket.spec SRPM URL: https://wojnilowicz.fedorapeople.org/rust-rocket-0.5.1-1.fc39.src.rpm rust2rpm.toml: https://wojnilowicz.fedorapeople.org/rocket/rust2rpm.toml Description: Web framework with a focus on usability, security, extensibility, and speed. Fedora Account System Username: wojnilowicz I plan on packaging https://github.com/ActivityWatch/aw-server-rust and rocket package is in its requirements chain. The chain is as follows: aw-server-rust->rocket.
[fedora-review-service-build]
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8091454 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2315472-rust-rocket/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08091454-rust-rocket/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8123129 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2315472-rust-rocket/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08123129-rust-rocket/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Looks good to me! Very simple package. I would have expected worse from an entire web framework :) === Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. ✅ package contains only permissible content ✅ package builds and installs without errors on rawhide ✅ test suite is run and all unit tests pass ✅ latest version of the crate is packaged ✅ license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora ✅ license file is included with %license in %files ✅ package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines Package APPROVED. === Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks: - set up package on release-monitoring.org: project: $crate homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate backend: crates.io version scheme: semantic version (*NOT* pre-release) filter: alpha;beta;rc;pre distro: Fedora Package: rust-$crate - add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer (should happen automatically) - set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional) - track package in koschei for all built branches (should happen automatically once rust-sig is co-maintainer)
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-rocket
Thank you for the review, and yeah, this looks simple compared to the aw-server-rust that builds upon it :)
FEDORA-2024-5e73fa28f4 (rust-rocket-0.5.1-1.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5e73fa28f4
FEDORA-2024-5e73fa28f4 (rust-rocket-0.5.1-1.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.