Bug 2316290 - Please update the post-upgrade tasks in the documentation
Summary: Please update the post-upgrade tasks in the documentation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: dnf5
Version: 41
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Petr Pisar
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-10-03 14:14 UTC by Timur Kristóf
Modified: 2024-10-22 11:53 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-10-22 11:53:51 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Fedora Pagure fedora-docs/quick-docs pull-request 766 0 None None None 2024-10-04 14:20:13 UTC
Fedora Pagure fedora-docs/quick-docs pull-request 767 0 None None None 2024-10-04 15:18:45 UTC
Fedora Pagure fedora-docs/quick-docs pull-request 768 0 None None None 2024-10-04 15:38:29 UTC
Github rpm-software-management dnf5 issues 1759 0 None open "dnf system-upgrade download" does not support --allowerasing 2024-10-04 15:38:29 UTC
Github rpm-software-management dnf5 issues 760 0 None open dnf [options] remove --duplicates 2024-10-04 15:38:29 UTC
Github rpm-software-management dnf5 issues 910 0 None open repoquery --unsatisfied 2024-10-04 13:24:01 UTC

Description Timur Kristóf 2024-10-03 14:14:27 UTC
I updated my laptop from Fedora 40 to Fedora 41 yesterday using the dnf system-upgrade plugin, following the instructions on this page:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-offline/

The upgrade worked fine, and I moved on to "Optional post-upgrade tasks", which have a recommendation to run "dnf repoquery --unsatisfied". It seems this command doesn't work anymore on Fedora 41 and yields the following error message:

Unknown argument "--unsatisfied" for command "repoquery". Add "--help" for more information about the arguments.

I am not sure, but I assume that the "--unsatisfied" argument was intentionally removed from dnf, in which case I recommend to please update the above documentation page to stop recommending running that command and maybe recommend an alternative instead.




Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Petr Pisar 2024-10-04 15:38:30 UTC
I reviewed the manual and posted some simple fixes there.
I also reported bugs against DNF5 which deserves fixing (https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/760, https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/1759). I kept them in the manual.

Comment 2 Petr Pisar 2024-10-22 11:11:44 UTC
2 of 3 fixes were merged into the documentation.

Comment 3 Petr Pisar 2024-10-22 11:53:51 UTC
The last fix was merged.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.