Bug 2316875 - Re-Review Request: dmz-cursor-themes - Style neutral cursors themes
Summary: Re-Review Request: dmz-cursor-themes - Style neutral cursors themes
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://packages.debian.org/sid/gnome...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-DEADREVIEW
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-10-06 23:39 UTC by Ivan Romanov
Modified: 2025-11-07 00:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-11-07 00:45:21 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ivan Romanov 2024-10-06 23:39:50 UTC
Spec URL: https://ivanromanov.fedorapeople.org/re-review/dmz-cursor-themes.spec
SRPM URL: https://ivanromanov.fedorapeople.org/re-review/dmz-cursor-themes-0.4.5-9.fc40.src.rpm
Description: Style neutral cursors themes
Fedora Account System Username: ivanromanov

This is re-review for retired package. Previously I was mainteiner of this package. But doesn't get any notification that my package was retired. Now I just want to restore it.

Koji scratch build:

* https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=124490380

Reproducible: Always

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-10-06 23:42:44 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8112314
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2316875-dmz-cursor-themes/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08112314-dmz-cursor-themes/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file copyright is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
- Not a valid SPDX expression 'CC-BY-SA'. It seems that you are using the old Fedora license abbreviations. Try `license-fedora2spdx' for converting it to SPDX.
  Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1
- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dmz-cursor-themes
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Package Review 2025-10-07 00:45:25 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 3 Package Review 2025-11-07 00:45:21 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.