Bug 2317869 - Please branch and build cmark in epel10
Summary: Please branch and build cmark in epel10
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: cmark
Version: epel10
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jens Petersen
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2326958 2328886 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: EPEL10Tracker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-10-10 17:10 UTC by Troy Dawson
Modified: 2024-12-07 06:21 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: cmark-0.30.3-5.el10_0
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2024-12-07 06:21:32 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
petersen: mirror+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker FC-1356 0 None None None 2024-11-18 14:58:55 UTC

Description Troy Dawson 2024-10-10 17:10:45 UTC
Please branch and build cmark in epel10
The Fedora rawhide version builds with no modifications on epel10.

If you do not wish to maintain cmark in epel10,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS tdawson);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cmark/adduser

Comment 1 Troy Dawson 2024-10-17 13:31:09 UTC
Ping. Can someone branch and build cmark in epel10?
The Fedora rawhide version builds with no modifications on epel10.

If you do not wish to maintain cmark in epel10,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package (FAS tdawson);
please add me through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cmark/adduser

Comment 2 Troy Dawson 2024-10-30 16:38:59 UTC
Hi Jens,
You branched epel10, and put this bug in POST, but nothing else has happened.
If you ran out of time, I could build the rawhide version on epel10.
Or are you in the middle of something, like upgrading the rawhide version before bringing it over to epel10?

Comment 3 Jens Petersen 2024-11-04 06:34:31 UTC
Hey Troy,

Yeah I haven't forgotten about this but didn't get to it yet, sorry.
Actually I was mostly blocked by some local changes I made to fbrnch - not finished yet.
So sure feel free to go ahead, I don't want to be a bottleneck here.

You are right though there may be a rawhide bump sooner/later which will require some rebuilding.

Comment 4 Troy Dawson 2024-11-04 15:51:23 UTC
Hi Jens,
Thanks for the info.
The package I need this for has another package, that is likely going to take another week before it makes it into EPEL10.
I'll wait until that last package is ready.  If you've updated things in Rawhide before then, go ahead and built it on EPEL10.
If you haven't built it on EPEL10 by the time I really need the package, I'll take whatever is currently in Rawhide.

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2024-11-18 14:57:26 UTC
*** Bug 2326958 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2024-11-28 09:54:21 UTC
*** Bug 2328886 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2024-11-28 14:27:04 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2d87c5f358 (cmark-0.30.3-5.el10_0) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.0.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2d87c5f358

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2024-11-29 03:56:31 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2d87c5f358 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2d87c5f358

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2024-12-07 06:21:32 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-2d87c5f358 (cmark-0.30.3-5.el10_0) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.0 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.