spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/kookbook/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08152586-kookbook/kookbook.spec srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/kookbook/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08152586-kookbook/kookbook-0.2.1%5E2024053056b0c4d9-1.fc42.src.rpm description: Simple application viewer based on markdown formatted recipes. fas: fed500 Reproducible: Always
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8152641 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2319426-kookbook/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08152641-kookbook/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== Summary ===== Notes: - Packaging guidelines state that there should be a separator between the snapshot date and the revision ('.', 'git', or 'g' would be appropriate) [1] - The license text isn't included when 'kookbook' is installed, but should be [2] I believe there is a missing dependency on the -extras subpackage from the arched base package - Inter-subpackage dependencies should be version-specific to avoid partial upgrades: `= %{version}%{release}` - Consider using the %ctest macro, or at the very least %__ctest - Though krecipies.py is installed as a sort of example and isn't executable as-is, consider requiring the Python interpreter needed to invoke it. - Licensing checks out - the CC stuff is for CI and isn't installed. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/#_complex_versioning [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#subpackage-licensing ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Creative Commons CC0 1.0", "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "*No copyright* Creative Commons CC0 1.0", "MIT License and/or X11 License". 32 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr- rpmbuild/results/kookbook/licensecheck.txt [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 5949 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in kookbook-extras , kookbook-touch , kookbook-krecipes-convert [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: kookbook-0.2.1^2024053056b0c4d9-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm kookbook-extras-0.2.1^2024053056b0c4d9-1.fc42.noarch.rpm kookbook-touch-0.2.1^2024053056b0c4d9-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm kookbook-krecipes-convert-0.2.1^2024053056b0c4d9-1.fc42.noarch.rpm kookbook-debuginfo-0.2.1^2024053056b0c4d9-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm kookbook-debugsource-0.2.1^2024053056b0c4d9-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm kookbook-0.2.1^2024053056b0c4d9-1.fc42.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpq_ueedzw')] checks: 32, packages: 7 kookbook.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kookbook kookbook-touch.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kookbooktouch kookbook.x86_64: W: no-documentation kookbook-touch.x86_64: W: no-documentation kookbook-extras.noarch: W: gzipped-svg-icon /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/kookbook.svgz kookbook-extras.noarch: W: description-shorter-than-summary 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings, 32 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.5 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: kookbook-debuginfo-0.2.1^2024053056b0c4d9-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm kookbook-touch-debuginfo-0.2.1^2024053056b0c4d9-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp40evomdq')] checks: 32, packages: 2 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 16 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.2 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- (none): E: there is no installed rpm "kookbook". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "kookbook-extras". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "kookbook-touch". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "kookbook-debuginfo". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "kookbook-krecipes-convert". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "kookbook-debugsource". (none): E: there is no installed rpm "kookbook-touch-debuginfo". There are no files to process nor additional arguments. Nothing to do, aborting. ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 7 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://invent.kde.org/utilities/kookbook/-/archive/56b0c4d9eb3fdf8829fee3c46ccd442c5348eacb/kookbook-56b0c4d9.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 09ef8da0cfc6cd8e41b87306ed41a74fcbcf8b65ac98781f95f0d0ac4f97f658 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 09ef8da0cfc6cd8e41b87306ed41a74fcbcf8b65ac98781f95f0d0ac4f97f658 Requires -------- kookbook (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libQt6Core.so.6()(64bit) libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit) libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6.8)(64bit) libQt6Gui.so.6()(64bit) libQt6Gui.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit) libQt6PrintSupport.so.6()(64bit) libQt6PrintSupport.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit) libQt6Widgets.so.6()(64bit) libQt6Widgets.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) kookbook-extras (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): hicolor-icon-theme kookbook-touch (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): kookbook-extras libQt6Core.so.6()(64bit) libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit) libQt6Core.so.6(Qt_6.8)(64bit) libQt6Gui.so.6()(64bit) libQt6Gui.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit) libQt6Qml.so.6()(64bit) libQt6Qml.so.6(Qt_6)(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) kookbook-krecipes-convert (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): kookbook-extras kookbook-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): kookbook-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- kookbook: application() application(org.kde.kookbook.desktop) kookbook kookbook(x86-64) kookbook-extras: kookbook-extras metainfo() metainfo(org.kde.kookbook.appdata.xml) kookbook-touch: application() application(org.kde.kookbooktouch.desktop) kookbook-touch kookbook-touch(x86-64) kookbook-krecipes-convert: kookbook-krecipes-convert kookbook-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) kookbook-debuginfo kookbook-debuginfo(x86-64) kookbook-debugsource: kookbook-debugsource kookbook-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name kookbook --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, C/C++, Generic Disabled plugins: PHP, Ocaml, R, Java, Haskell, Perl, SugarActivity, Python, fonts Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH
Thanks for the feedback. > - Packaging guidelines state that there should be a separator between the > snapshot date and the revision ('.', 'git', or 'g' would be appropriate) [1] Added a '.' > - The license text isn't included when 'kookbook' is installed, but should be [2] > I believe there is a missing dependency on the -extras subpackage from the arched > base package Made this dependency of the base package. > - Inter-subpackage dependencies should be version-specific to avoid > partial upgrades: `= %{version}%{release}` Added this. Thanks. > - Consider using the %ctest macro, or at the very least %__ctest Used %ctest macro. > - Though krecipies.py is installed as a sort of example and isn't executable as-is, > consider requiring the Python interpreter needed to invoke it. Have left this for know. Will check with upstream on whether there is intent to fully develop it. spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/kookbook/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08158373-kookbook/kookbook.spec srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/kookbook/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08158373-kookbook/kookbook-0.2.1%5E20240530.56b0c4d9-1.fc42.src.rpm
Created attachment 2052843 [details] The .spec file difference from Copr build 8152641 to 8158439
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8158439 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2319426-kookbook/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08158439-kookbook/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Sorry, this dropped off my radar. Looks great! Package APPROVED
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kookbook
Thanks for the review.
FEDORA-2024-0cf37b65b2 (kookbook-0.2.1^20240530.56b0c4d9-1.fc40) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 40. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-0cf37b65b2
FEDORA-2024-a2c715d4df (kookbook-0.2.1^20240530.56b0c4d9-1.fc41) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 41. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-a2c715d4df
FEDORA-2024-0cf37b65b2 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-0cf37b65b2 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-0cf37b65b2 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2024-a2c715d4df has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-a2c715d4df \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-a2c715d4df See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2024-501bbfce47 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-501bbfce47` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-501bbfce47 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2024-e78b929b7e has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2024-e78b929b7e` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-e78b929b7e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2024-501bbfce47 (kookbook-0.2.1^20240530.56b0c4d9-2.fc40) has been pushed to the Fedora 40 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2024-e78b929b7e (kookbook-0.2.1^20240530.56b0c4d9-2.fc41) has been pushed to the Fedora 41 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.