Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log
snippests):
Within Cloud Pak for Data, a DB2/db2oltp Service Instance (db2uclusters.db2u.databases.ibm.com CR) creates multiple PVC's that include the instance ID:
````
astreit@Andrews-MacBook-Pro-2 cp4d % oc get pvc
NAME                                                        STATUS   VOLUME                                     CAPACITY   ACCESS MODES   STORAGECLASS                    VOLUMEATTRIBUTESCLASS   AGE
activelogs-c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-db2u-0                Bound    pvc-80a18968-d51d-485c-8f1e-74cc1d2c4913   100Gi      RWO            ocs-storagecluster-ceph-rbd     <unset>                 28h
archivelogs-c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-db2u-0               Bound    pvc-284ea868-2249-410b-8179-f40f58fc6cf6   100Gi      RWO            ocs-storagecluster-ceph-rbd     <unset>                 28h
c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-backup                           Bound    pvc-8307cd4b-bd9f-4839-9a81-3b213bc0b86b   100Gi      RWX            ocs-storagecluster-cephfs       <unset>                 28h
c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-meta                             Bound    pvc-3e984121-337f-428e-ba28-48efba7a292f   100Gi      RWX            ocs-storagecluster-cephfs       <unset>                 28h
data-c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-db2u-0                      Bound    pvc-3a085680-f51c-4ea1-90a0-02f63ad4df5b   100Gi      RWO            ocs-storagecluster-ceph-rbd     <unset>                 28h
tempts-c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-db2u-0                    Bound    pvc-ae2b4779-7eb2-42a3-8f65-6bc885529913   100Gi      RWO            ocs-storagecluster-ceph-rbd     <unset>                 28h
````

When replicating a Protected Application volumes via Volsync within the context of ACM Disaster recovery/Enroll Application/Discovered Application, it appears Volsync pre-pends "volsync-" when generating replicated PVC and "volsync-rsync-tls-src-" when generating Volsync Job/Pod names.  The additional characters result in the following error/failure within the corresponding ReplicationSource CR:
````
astreit@Andrews-MacBook-Pro-2 cp4d % oc get replicationsource -n cpd-ins activelogs-c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-db2u-0 -o yaml
apiVersion: volsync.backube/v1alpha1
kind: ReplicationSource
metadata:
  creationTimestamp: "2024-10-15T19:11:13Z"
  generation: 1
  labels:
    volumereplicationgroups-owner: cpd-op-ins
    volumereplicationgroups-owner-namespace: openshift-dr-ops
  name: activelogs-c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-db2u-0
  namespace: cpd-ins
  resourceVersion: "29531017"
  uid: 80583267-a83c-4c81-a1b4-868df61b4bf4
spec:
  rsyncTLS:
    accessModes:
    - ReadWriteOnce
    address: volsync-rsync-tls-dst-activelogs-c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-db2u-0.cpd-ins.svc.clusterset.local
    copyMethod: Snapshot
    keySecret: cpd-op-ins-vs-secret
    storageClassName: ocs-storagecluster-ceph-rbd
    volumeSnapshotClassName: ocs-storagecluster-rbdplugin-snapclass
  sourcePVC: activelogs-c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-db2u-0
  trigger:
    schedule: '*/5 * * * *'
status:
  conditions:
  - lastTransitionTime: "2024-10-15T19:11:42Z"
    message: 'Job.batch "volsync-rsync-tls-src-activelogs-c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-db2u-0"
      is invalid: spec.template.labels: Invalid value: "volsync-rsync-tls-src-activelogs-c-db2oltp-1728992150475551-db2u-0":
      must be no more than 63 characters'
    reason: Error
    status: "False"
    type: Synchronizing
  lastSyncStartTime: "2024-10-15T19:11:13Z"
  latestMoverStatus: {}
  rsyncTLS: {}
````

Version of all relevant components (if applicable):


Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product
(please explain in detail what is the user impact)?
Yes, the naming of db2oltp PVC's are valid and not managed by the user.

Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge?
No. Db2 containerized offering can not changed.

Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this
bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)?
2

Can this issue reproducible?
Yes

Can this issue reproduce from the UI?
Yes


If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.


Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info: