Bug 232124 - gfs2_fsck will create multiple lost+found directories
gfs2_fsck will create multiple lost+found directories
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gfs2-utils (Show other bugs)
5.1
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Robert Peterson
Dean Jansa
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-03-13 17:55 EDT by Josef Bacik
Modified: 2010-01-11 22:37 EST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2007-0579
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-11-07 13:04:42 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Patch to fix the problem (833 bytes, patch)
2007-03-15 18:51 EDT, Robert Peterson
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Josef Bacik 2007-03-13 17:55:47 EDT
in trying to track down bz 232010 i've found that its possible to get multiple 
lost+found directories when running gfs_fsck.  So first we get the first 
assertion, i reboot everything and run a gfs2_fsck on the filesystem.  This 
creates a lost+found, b/c i was deleting crap.  So I go in and try to delete 
the lost+found directory, and I will then panic (bz 232107).  I reboot again 
and run gfs2_fsck on the filesystem again, and then remount the filesystem.  
Then I will have a second lost+found directory.  I am in the middle of 
attempting to reproduce this again to make sure it wasn't a fluke and this is 
in fact how you reproduce.  I will let you tomorrow when I get back to testing 
this.
Comment 1 Robert Peterson 2007-03-15 18:51:03 EDT
Created attachment 150180 [details]
Patch to fix the problem

Patch tested on trin-10 by using gfs2_edit to break the directory
links to force things into lost+found.	This problem doesn't exist
in GFS1, so it doesn't have to be back-ported.
Comment 2 Robert Peterson 2007-03-26 15:34:19 EDT
Fix committed to cvs in HEAD and RHEL5 branches.
Changing status to modified.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2007-11-07 13:04:42 EST
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0579.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.