Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/lpsolve-xli-CPLEX/lpsolve-xli-CPLEX.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/lpsolve-xli-CPLEX/lpsolve-xli-CPLEX-5.5.2.11-1.fc42.src.rpm Description: This library allows lpsolve to read and write model files in the CPLEX linear programming format. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8172849 (failed) Build log: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2321532-lpsolve-xli-cplex/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08172849-lpsolve-xli-CPLEX/builder-live.log.gz Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide. - If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network unavailability), please ignore it. - If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they are listed in the "Depends On" field --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
That's great, thanks! Except it needs the files yacc_read.[ch] from the main lpsolve source tree to build properly, I believe: if I copy them in in a hacky way I think it builds ok.
Confirming also it seems to run fine, as long as the built libxli_CPLEX.so is in a sane place on the path (probably /lib/lib64 ?) Just for records, usage is usually something like % lp_solve -rxli xli_CPLEX model.lpt
It only needs yacc_read.h header file. I added that file into lpsolve-devel-5.5.2.11-7.fc42.
Thanks Petr. That should do the trick. There are other xli interfaces too in the lpsolve code, so others may profit from the header in the lpsolve-devel rpm if those other interfaces appear as separate rpms in the future...
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience.
I'm still interested in packaging this software.