spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/jove/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08175081-jove/jove.spec srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/jove/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08175081-jove/jove-4.17.5.3-1.fc42.src.rpm description: Jove is a compact, powerful Emacs-style text-editor. It provides the common emacs keyboard bindings, together with a reasonable assortment of the most popular advanced features (e.g. interactive shell windows, compile-it, language specific modes) while weighing in with CPU, memory, and disk requirements comparable to vi(1). It is 8-bit clean, but does not support Unicode (or UTF-8 etc). fas: fed500 The package is currently orphaned, but still in Epel 7. Have claimed ownership, but as the licensing is unclear, and the package has changed since it was last in Fedora, would like a re-review would be helpful. Reproducible: Always
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8175155 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2321770-jove/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08175155-jove/fedora-review/review.txt Found issues: - Not a valid SPDX expression 'Copyright Only'. Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 - A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jove Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names Please know that there can be false-positives. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
License review https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/584
Can you try rebuilding on rawhide ? It does not mock for me.
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience.