Bug 2322961 - Review Request: python-microsoft-security-utilities-secret-masker - Microsoft Security Utilities - Secret Masker
Summary: Review Request: python-microsoft-security-utilities-secret-masker - Microsoft...
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neil Hanlon
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://pypi.org/project/%{srcname}/
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-10-31 16:09 UTC by Jeremy Cline
Modified: 2024-11-01 00:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
neil: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jeremy Cline 2024-10-31 16:09:29 UTC
Spec URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/new-packages/python-microsoft-security-utilities-secret-masker.spec
SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/new-packages/python-microsoft-security-utilities-secret-masker-1.0.0~b3-1.fc42.src.rpm

Description:
The Secret Masker Python library focuses on:

  - providing some built-in detection rules in json format
  - detecting sensitive data for given input
  - masking sensitive data with simple symbols or sha256 hash for given input

Fedora Account System Username: jcline

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-10-31 16:13:55 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8195622
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2322961-python-microsoft-security-utilities-secret-masker/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08195622-python-microsoft-security-utilities-secret-masker/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Neil Hanlon 2024-11-01 00:55:09 UTC
No review issues found.

Please add the LICENSE file in the source tarball as %license in the spec.

--

PACKAGE APPROVED


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.