Description of problem: Epel repository (https://rhel.pkgs.org/9/epel-x86_64/xrdp-0.10.1-1.el9.x86_64.rpm.html) mentions 3 licenses with AND condition between them - ASL 2.0 and GPLv2+ and MIT, but source code mentions only MIT license (https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp). Can you please clarify if it is dual license with AND of them or just MIT license as mentioned in their Git repo? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.10.1 How reproducible: N/A Steps to Reproduce: N/A Actual results: N/A Expected results: N/A Additional info: N/A
Right now, xrdp is licensed under ASL 2.0: https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/blob/devel/COPYING https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/blob/v0.10/COPYING However, it used to be licensed under GPL 2+: https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/commit/1123323fda6d128fb98b0427e0ea5f6a2dc9e632 If you find mentions of MIT licence in the code, it is entirely possible that some files have been brought in that were licences that way. MIT is a permissive licence and I would not be surprised for this to be the case. If you need 100% authoritative view on this, please open an upstream bug and ask there. The developers will know for sure.