Description of problem: Epel repository (https://rhel.pkgs.org/9/epel-x86_64/xrdp-0.10.1-1.el9.x86_64.rpm.html) mentions 3 licenses with AND condition between them - ASL 2.0 and GPLv2+ and MIT, but source code mentions only MIT license (https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp). Can you please clarify if it is dual license with AND of them or just MIT license as mentioned in their Git repo? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.10.1 How reproducible: N/A Steps to Reproduce: N/A Actual results: N/A Expected results: N/A Additional info: N/A
Right now, xrdp is licensed under ASL 2.0: https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/blob/devel/COPYING https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/blob/v0.10/COPYING However, it used to be licensed under GPL 2+: https://github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/commit/1123323fda6d128fb98b0427e0ea5f6a2dc9e632 If you find mentions of MIT licence in the code, it is entirely possible that some files have been brought in that were licences that way. MIT is a permissive licence and I would not be surprised for this to be the case. If you need 100% authoritative view on this, please open an upstream bug and ask there. The developers will know for sure.
FEDORA-2026-febea89ac3 (xrdp-0.10.5-1.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-febea89ac3
FEDORA-2026-b409dad73e (xrdp-0.10.5-1.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-b409dad73e
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-d12ea63356 (xrdp-0.10.5-1.el9) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2026-d12ea63356
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-d12ea63356 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2026-d12ea63356 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-5c626357f7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2026-5c626357f7 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2026-febea89ac3 has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-febea89ac3` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-febea89ac3 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2026-b409dad73e has been pushed to the Fedora 42 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-b409dad73e` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-b409dad73e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-5c626357f7 (xorgxrdp-0.10.5-1.el8 and xrdp-0.10.5-1.el8) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-EPEL-2026-d12ea63356 (xorgxrdp-0.10.5-1.el9 and xrdp-0.10.5-1.el9) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2026-b409dad73e (xorgxrdp-0.10.5-1.fc42 and xrdp-0.10.5-1.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2026-febea89ac3 (xorgxrdp-0.10.5-1.fc43 and xrdp-0.10.5-1.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.