Bug 2323494 - Review Request: kscreenlocker5 - Library and components for secure lock screen architecture [NEEDINFO]
Summary: Review Request: kscreenlocker5 - Library and components for secure lock scree...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://invent.kde.org/plasma/kscreen...
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2323493
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-11-03 12:18 UTC by Felix Wang
Modified: 2025-11-04 00:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
package-review: needinfo? (topazus)


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Felix Wang 2024-11-03 12:18:03 UTC
Spec URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/kscreenlocker5.spec
SRPM URL: https://topazus.fedorapeople.org/kscreenlocker5-5.27.11-1.fc42.src.rpm
Description: Library and components for secure lock screen architecture
Fedora Account System Username: topazus

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-11-03 12:19:52 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8205153
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2323494-kscreenlocker5/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08205153-kscreenlocker5/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Package Review 2025-11-04 00:45:21 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.