Bug 232358 – Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API

Bug 232358 - Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API

Summary:	Review Request: jack-rack - Stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	Package Review (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:	FE-DEADREVIEW
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-03-14 19:17 EDT by Anthony Green
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2007-10-03 16:47:57 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Anthony Green 2007-03-14 19:17:35 EDT

Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/jack-rack.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/jack-rack-1.4.5-2.src.rpm
Description: 
JACK Rack is a stereo LADSPA effects rack for the JACK audio API.  It uses
GTK+ 2 for the gui. LADSPA version 1.1 is needed.

This package was derived from the PlanetCCRMA package.

Comment 1 Till Maas 2007-08-28 17:25:36 EDT

When I download the Spec or SRPM, they only contain nullbytes.

Comment 2 Hans de Goede 2007-09-17 15:56:57 EDT

Same for me (only nullbytes), notice that there has been another submission, see
bug 285331, are you still interested in maintaining this? Maybe the two of you
can co-maintain?

Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2007-10-03 16:47:57 EDT

Anthony, I understand / guess that you are awefully busy with other work. Since
this bug isn't going anywhere fast, I'm closing it as a dead review and moving
on with the new review request posted in bug 285331. I'll add you to the CC
there, please drop a note there if you want to co-maintain this, then you can be
added to the owners list when filing the CVS admin request for the CVS branch
creation.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.