Bug 2323713 - Review Request: modpoll - A command line tool for Modbus and MQTT
Summary: Review Request: modpoll - A command line tool for Modbus and MQTT
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Phil Wyett
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/gavinying/modpoll
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: IoT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-11-04 19:35 UTC by Peter Robinson
Modified: 2026-03-23 00:15 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-03-23 00:15:46 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:
philip.wyett: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9769597 to 9775466 (832 bytes, patch)
2025-11-07 04:19 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9775466 to 9883282 (733 bytes, patch)
2025-12-07 11:06 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9883282 to 10225222 (926 bytes, patch)
2026-03-14 10:24 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10225222 to 10225616 (463 bytes, patch)
2026-03-14 13:40 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Peter Robinson 2024-11-04 19:35:03 UTC
SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/modpoll.spec
SRPM: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/modpoll-1.3.3-1.fc41.src.rpm

Description:
A command line tool for Modbus and MQTT

FAS: pbrobinson

koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125512021

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-11-04 19:37:05 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8209906
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2323713-modpoll/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08209906-modpoll/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Package Review 2025-11-05 00:45:33 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 3 Peter Robinson 2025-11-05 09:46:22 UTC
yes

Comment 4 Benson Muite 2025-11-05 13:55:20 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-05 13:57:01 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9769597
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2323713-modpoll/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09769597-modpoll/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Benson Muite 2025-11-05 14:01:41 UTC
Can you update to the latest release 1.5.1?

Pymodbus in Fedora is 3.9.2:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pymodbus

The Package seems to need 3.6.9:
https://github.com/gavinying/modpoll/blob/master/pyproject.toml#L13

Maybe it would work if the dependency restriction is relaxed?

Comment 7 Peter Robinson 2025-11-06 09:43:20 UTC
Yes, when I submitted this is was the right version, I updated all that in my local/copr build but given no one had picked this up in a year I'd not updated it.

SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/modpoll.spec
SRPM: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/modpoll-1.5.1-1.fc43.src.rpm

koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=138771786

Comment 8 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-07 04:19:22 UTC
Created attachment 2113148 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9769597 to 9775466

Comment 9 Fedora Review Service 2025-11-07 04:19:24 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9775466
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2323713-modpoll/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09775466-modpoll/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 11 Fedora Review Service 2025-12-07 11:06:22 UTC
Created attachment 2117790 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9775466 to 9883282

Comment 12 Fedora Review Service 2025-12-07 11:06:24 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9883282
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2323713-modpoll/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/09883282-modpoll/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 13 Peter Robinson 2025-12-07 11:22:54 UTC
Fixed the missing v in the source URL too.

Comment 14 Phil Wyett 2026-03-14 07:00:06 UTC
Hi,

I will take this one, review to follow.

Regards

Phil

Comment 15 Phil Wyett 2026-03-14 07:09:13 UTC
Hi,

Issue I see is 'tests' in the package but no '%check' section with test triggering.

With the above resolved I believe we can move forward.

Regards

Phil

Comment 16 Peter Robinson 2026-03-14 10:01:00 UTC
> Issue I see is 'tests' in the package but no '%check' section with test
> triggering.

The tests need external connectivity so they fail in the constrained build environment so I never enabled them, also given it's modbus, a physical HW, I'm not sure of the value of running the tests. I can add them to the spec wrapped in an if tests for completeness if you insist.

Comment 18 Fedora Review Service 2026-03-14 10:24:36 UTC
Created attachment 2133374 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9883282 to 10225222

Comment 19 Fedora Review Service 2026-03-14 10:24:39 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10225222
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2323713-modpoll/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10225222-modpoll/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 20 Phil Wyett 2026-03-14 10:37:09 UTC
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #16)
> > Issue I see is 'tests' in the package but no '%check' section with test
> > triggering.
> 
> The tests need external connectivity so they fail in the constrained build
> environment so I never enabled them, also given it's modbus, a physical HW,
> I'm not sure of the value of running the tests. I can add them to the spec
> wrapped in an if tests for completeness if you insist.

No need to add the tests after looking at them.

One thing to fix is 'spectool -g -R <specfile>'.

philwyett @ ks-kenobi ~/Development/rpm_build >> spectool -g -R SPECS/modpoll.spec 
Downloading: https://github.com/gavinying/modpoll/archive/1.6.0.tar.gz#/modpoll-1.6.0.tar.gz
Download failed:
404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://codeload.github.com/gavinying/modpoll/tar.gz/1.6.0#/modpoll-1.6.0.tar.gz

Change 'Source0' to line below.

Source0: %{url}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

Regards

Phil

Comment 21 Peter Robinson 2026-03-14 10:54:03 UTC
Can you do the full review and just leave me a single list of things that need fixing?

Comment 22 Phil Wyett 2026-03-14 11:06:14 UTC
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #21)
> Can you do the full review and just leave me a single list of things that
> need fixing?

Comment 20 is the last thing that needs to be fixed.

I try to give full one shot reviews, but other tasks and my disability sometimes do not allow it.
I am trying to work from the oldest review requests to the newest (reviews that I have interest
and experience in), a task I do not see anyone else taking on.

Do this last thing and I will mark as '+' and allow you to request repo and import the latest srpm.

Regards

Phil

Comment 24 Fedora Review Service 2026-03-14 13:40:44 UTC
Created attachment 2133396 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 10225222 to 10225616

Comment 25 Fedora Review Service 2026-03-14 13:40:46 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/10225616
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2323713-modpoll/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/10225616-modpoll/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 26 Phil Wyett 2026-03-14 15:30:36 UTC
Hi,

Looks good to me. Apologies for the emotional dump, but I do what I can when I can.

Marking as '+'. As seasoned packager you will now be able to:

1. Request reo.
2. Import latestt srpm.

etc. :-)

Regards

Phil

Comment 27 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2026-03-14 15:59:00 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/modpoll

Comment 28 Peter Robinson 2026-03-14 15:59:46 UTC
Thanks! And no problems, as they once said on the internet no one knows you're a dog :)

Comment 29 Fedora Update System 2026-03-14 17:48:26 UTC
FEDORA-2026-ad97dca847 (modpoll-1.6.0-1.fc44) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 44.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-ad97dca847

Comment 30 Fedora Update System 2026-03-15 01:30:55 UTC
FEDORA-2026-ad97dca847 has been pushed to the Fedora 44 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2026-ad97dca847 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2026-ad97dca847

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 31 Fedora Update System 2026-03-23 00:15:46 UTC
FEDORA-2026-ad97dca847 (modpoll-1.6.0-1.fc44) has been pushed to the Fedora 44 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.