# gdb /sbin/restore GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.5-15.fc6rh) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". (gdb) set args -i -f boss-var-03-13-07 (gdb) r Starting program: /sbin/restore -i -f boss-var-03-13-07 warning: shared library handler failed to enable breakpoint Dump tape is compressed. /sbin/restore > add * /sbin/restore > extract You have not read any volumes yet. Unless you know which volume your file(s) are on you should start with the last volume and work towards the first. Specify next volume # (none if no more volumes): 1 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. readxattr (buffer=0x7ffffc1aa6c0 "") at tape.c:1234 1234 if (curfile.dip->di_size > XATTR_MAXSIZE) { (gdb) bt #0 readxattr (buffer=0x7ffffc1aa6c0 "") at tape.c:1234 #1 0x000000000040a2ed in extractattr (path=0x7245d6 "./log/httpd/error_log_www2.zie.pg.gda.pl") at tape.c:1042 #2 0x000000000040a4b7 in extractfile (ep=0x0, doremove=<value optimized out>) at tape.c:1010 #3 0x0000000000405b35 in createfiles () at restore.c:1063 #4 0x0000000000402da9 in runcmdshell () at interactive.c:217 #5 0x0000000000404c61 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7ffffc1b6d60) at main.c:491 #6 0x00000000004472f0 in __libc_start_main () #7 0x00000000004001b9 in _start () (gdb)
Could you tell me if you're able restore uncompressed backup, please? (And if this could be dupe of bug #233325) Regards, -A-
This is not a dupe of #233325 which dealt with remote compressed files, while here we have a bug with local files. It is probably related to the extended attributes. Are you able to reproduce this behaviour on a small data set (dumping a directory containing only a few files) and give me access to the dump ? Alternatively, if your boss-var-03-13-07 is not huge and does not contain sensitive data, can you give me access to that ?
Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks. If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change. Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
This bug is open for a Fedora version that is no longer maintained and will not be fixed by Fedora. Therefore we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen thus bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.