Bug 2324599 (CVE-2024-50186) - CVE-2024-50186 kernel: net: explicitly clear the sk pointer, when pf->create fails
Summary: CVE-2024-50186 kernel: net: explicitly clear the sk pointer, when pf->crea...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2024-50186
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2324686
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-11-08 13:47 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2025-05-13 08:33 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2025:6966 0 None None None 2025-05-13 08:33:56 UTC

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2024-11-08 13:47:38 UTC
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: explicitly clear the sk pointer, when pf->create fails

We have recently noticed the exact same KASAN splat as in commit
6cd4a78d962b ("net: do not leave a dangling sk pointer, when socket
creation fails"). The problem is that commit did not fully address the
problem, as some pf->create implementations do not use sk_common_release
in their error paths.

For example, we can use the same reproducer as in the above commit, but
changing ping to arping. arping uses AF_PACKET socket and if packet_create
fails, it will just sk_free the allocated sk object.

While we could chase all the pf->create implementations and make sure they
NULL the freed sk object on error from the socket, we can't guarantee
future protocols will not make the same mistake.

So it is easier to just explicitly NULL the sk pointer upon return from
pf->create in __sock_create. We do know that pf->create always releases the
allocated sk object on error, so if the pointer is not NULL, it is
definitely dangling.

Comment 2 errata-xmlrpc 2025-05-13 08:33:55 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2025:6966 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:6966


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.