visidata fails to build with Python 3.14.0a1. ________________________ TestVisidataPath.test_withName ________________________ self = <visidata.tests.test_path.TestVisidataPath object at 0x7efcbe0a02d0> def test_withName(self): 'tests for visidata.Path().with_name' file_path = Path('sample_data/sample.tsv') url_path = Path('https://visidata.org/hello/sample.tsv') assert 'sample_data/b.tsv' == str(file_path.with_name('b.tsv')), '{} should be sample_data/b.tsv'.format(file_path.with_name('b.tsv')) assert 'sample_data/a/b.tsv' == str(file_path.with_name('a/b.tsv')), '{} should be sample_data/a/b.tsv'.format(file_path.with_name('a/b.tsv')) assert "https://visidata.org/hello/b.tsv" == str(url_path.with_name('b.tsv')), '{} should be https://visidata.org/hello/b.tsv'.format(url_path.with_name('b.tsv')) assert "https://visidata.org/hello/a/b.tsv" == str(url_path.with_name('a/b.tsv')), '{} should be https://visidata.org/hello/a/b.tsv'.format(url_path.with_name('a/b.tsv')) assert Path('foo.a.b').base_stem == 'foo.a' assert Path('foo.a.b').ext == 'b' assert Path('foo').ext == '' assert Path('foo').base_stem == 'foo' assert Path('foo.').ext == '' > assert Path('foo.').base_stem == 'foo.' E AssertionError: assert 'foo' == 'foo.' E E - foo. E ? - E + foo visidata/tests/test_path.py:25: AssertionError https://docs.python.org/3.14/whatsnew/3.14.html For the build logs, see: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.14/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08239850-visidata/ For all our attempts to build visidata with Python 3.14, see: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.14/package/visidata/ Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.14: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.14/ Let us know here if you have any questions. Python 3.14 is planned to be included in Fedora 43. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.14. A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon. We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 42 development cycle. Changing version to 42.