spec: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/bearssl/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08247059-bearssl/bearssl.spec srpm: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fed500/bearssl/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08247059-bearssl/bearssl-0.6-1.fc42.src.rpm description: BearSSL is an implementation of the SSL/TLS protocol (RFC 5246) written in C. It aims at offering the following features: - Be correct and secure. In particular, insecure protocol versions and choices of algorithms are not supported, by design; cryptographic algorithm implementations are constant-time by default. - Be small, both in RAM and code footprint. For instance, a minimal server implementation may fit in about 20 kilobytes of compiled code and 25 kilobytes of RAM. - Be highly portable. BearSSL targets not only “big†operating systems like Linux and Windows, but also small embedded systems and even special contexts like bootstrap code. - Be feature-rich and extensible. SSL/TLS has many defined cipher suites and extensions; BearSSL should implement most of them, and allow extra algorithm implementations to be added afterwards, possibly from third parties. fas: fed500 Reproducible: Always
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8247081 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2325519-bearssl/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08247081-bearssl/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Please refer to the relevant policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CryptoPolicies/#_new_crypto_libraries In particular, don't make the same mistakes as those that happened in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302646 / https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3267
Thanks, raised https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1407
This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience.
Closing for now.