Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 2327311

Summary: Request the ability to trash images via namespace deletion in the API
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Paul Roberts <proberts>
Component: Ceph-DashboardAssignee: Nizamudeen <nia>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Sunil Kumar Nagaraju <sunnagar>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Anjana Suparna Sriram <asriram>
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.1CC: afrahman, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, tserlin, vdas
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 8.1   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-19.2.1-31.el9cp Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-06-26 12:19:21 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Paul Roberts 2024-11-19 16:17:36 UTC
Description of problem:
After discussion on Slack with Aviv and Nizam we have requested a new flag, --rbd-trash-image, be added to gRPC as part of namespace delete. To take advantage of this in the vSphere plugin we also need this to be an option we can request via the RESTAPI through /api/nvmeof/subsystem/{nqn}/namespace
as we currently do for the converse via "create_image": "true" in /api/nvmeof/subsystem/{nqn}/namespace

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2025-06-26 12:19:21 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.1 security, bug fix, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:9775