Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0 on a still to be determined date in the near future. The original upgrade date has been delayed.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 23302 - MBX: dhrystone performance
MBX: dhrystone performance
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Product: eCos
Classification: Retired
Component: HAL (Show other bugs)
CVS
i386 Linux
medium Severity low
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: ecc-bugs-int
ecc-bugs-int
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2001-01-04 09:21 EST by Jesper Skov
Modified: 2007-04-18 12:30 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-01-24 07:31:31 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Jesper Skov 2001-01-04 09:21:38 EST 
Way back when, I ran dhrystone tests on both eCos and Linux on the 
same MBX board. The  version on Linux ran quite a bit faster. Possibly
missing some board initialization magic in the HAL.
Comment 1 George Thomas 2002-01-24 07:31:25 EST 
I just noticed that the performance of the MBX board when running from RAM is
less than 50% of what it is when run from ROM.  This is most likely a RAM vs.
ROM hardware configuration problem (the RAM is DRAM which runs via a complicated
setup).  Fix this anomaly and you'll probably fix the Dhrystone performance
problem as well.
Comment 2 George Thomas 2002-04-11 13:23:44 EDT 
The caches were not being set up properly, certainly not for RAM based
applications.  This has been fixed and the Dhrystone benchmark now runs more
than 4 times faster than before.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.