SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/OpenCL-ICD-Loader-Review/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08341254-OpenCL-ICD-Loader/OpenCL-ICD-Loader.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/frantisekz/OpenCL-ICD-Loader-Review/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08341254-OpenCL-ICD-Loader/OpenCL-ICD-Loader-3.0.6-1.20241023git5907ac1.fc42.src.rpm This is an alternative OpenCL Loader to already packaged ocl-icd. Some time ago I've got a request that it may be beneficiary for some compute workloads to include the Khronos provided icd implementation. It may become the default one one day, however, I do not "know enough" to propose that, so this is plainly an alternative implementation that provides libOpenCL.so . I wasn't sure for the version field - it now uses the "loader exposed version".
The ticket summary is not in the correct format. Expected: Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here> Found: Review Request: OpenCL-ICD-Loader: Khronos official OpenCL ICD Loader As a consequence, the package name cannot be parsed and submitted to be automatically build. Please modify the ticket summary and trigger a build by typing [fedora-review-service-build]. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Taking this review.
[fedora-review-service-build]
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8341598 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2330385-opencl-icd-loader/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08341598-OpenCL-ICD-Loader/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
> Conflicts: ocl-icd > Conflicts: ocl-icd-devel We probably want virtual provides+conflicts to make them equivalent providers eventually.
Review notes: * Package follows packaging guidelines * Package builds and installs * Package conflicts are correct * No serious issues from rpmlint PACKAGE APPROVED.
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/OpenCL-ICD-Loader
FEDORA-2024-e9099a34d5 (OpenCL-ICD-Loader-3.0.6-1.20241023git5907ac1.fc42) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 42. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-e9099a34d5
FEDORA-2024-e9099a34d5 (OpenCL-ICD-Loader-3.0.6-1.20241023git5907ac1.fc42) has been pushed to the Fedora 42 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
There are now conflicting ICD loaders in both F41 and rawhide (F42), this and ocl-icd. Which and by what criteria should I choose one (e.g. for flatpak runtimes)? What value is there to having both?
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days