Bug 2333620 - Review Request: eask - Emacs Lisp dependency manager
Summary: Review Request: eask - Emacs Lisp dependency manager
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/emacs-eask/cli
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-12-21 00:07 UTC by Peter Oliver
Modified: 2025-12-21 22:50 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Peter Oliver 2024-12-21 00:07:18 UTC
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/eask/raw/main/f/eask.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/mavit/eask/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08431108-eask/eask-0.10.2-2.fc42.src.rpm
Description: CLI for building, running, testing, and managing your Emacs Lisp dependencies.
Fedora Account System Username: mavit

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2024-12-21 00:10:58 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8431153
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2333620-eask/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08431153-eask/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- License file LICENSE.txt is not marked as %license
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Package Review 2025-12-21 00:45:28 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the
NEEDINFO flag.

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group.

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.