Bug 2333842 - Please branch and build for EPEL10
Summary: Please branch and build for EPEL10
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: exim
Version: epel10
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jaroslav Škarvada
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2325188 2333839 2333840
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2024-12-23 13:17 UTC by Marcel Haerry
Modified: 2025-07-13 01:45 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: exim-4.98.2-2.el10_1
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-07-13 01:45:01 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Marcel Haerry 2024-12-23 13:17:26 UTC
It would be nice to have it there.

The following dependencies are not yet in EPEL 10:

* libspf2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2333839
  * perl-String-Escape: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2333838
* opendmarc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2333840
  * libspf2
* libgsasl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2325188

Comment 1 Jaroslav Škarvada 2025-01-06 11:11:55 UTC
I am OK to maintain exim in EPEL-10, but not the deps.

Comment 2 Marcel Haerry 2025-01-06 15:14:42 UTC
libgsasl is still open, but opendmarc is in an assigend state. The other dependencies got built and pushed, so I guess the deps should get taken care of.

Comment 3 Marcel Haerry 2025-04-05 11:24:09 UTC
All dependencies are built an in EPEL 10 - friendly ping if exim could now be built as well.

Comment 4 Renich Bon Ciric 2025-06-01 21:27:33 UTC
I, too, respectfully, would like to join this request.

Comment 5 Jaroslav Škarvada 2025-06-23 16:42:20 UTC
I branched exim, but I cannot build it:
> No matching package to install: 'libopendmarc-devel'

It's strange, it seems it was pushed to bodhi:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-a26fca03a4

But the package isn't there:
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/10/Everything/x86_64/Packages/l/

I will open releng ticket.

Comment 6 Jaroslav Škarvada 2025-06-23 16:47:51 UTC
Releng ticket:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12786

Comment 7 Renich Bon Ciric 2025-06-23 20:25:23 UTC
The releng issue has been resolved. :)

Comment 8 Jaroslav Škarvada 2025-06-24 12:24:38 UTC
(In reply to Renich Bon Ciric from comment #7)
> The releng issue has been resolved. :)

I know, I closed it. It's waiting now for the opendmarc package to be tagged back to the stable branch which IMHO can take few days:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-6da3ba3feb

Comment 9 Renich Bon Ciric 2025-07-01 00:21:39 UTC
Awesome. Thanks! :)

Comment 10 Jaroslav Škarvada 2025-07-03 22:39:20 UTC
It's built now, but it cannot be pushed to bodhi at the moment. I will retry later, the temporal failures are caused by ongoing Fedora datacenter move.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2025-07-04 08:16:52 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-b8b2a12b2a (exim-4.98.2-2.el10_1) has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 10.1.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-b8b2a12b2a

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2025-07-05 01:11:29 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-b8b2a12b2a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2025-b8b2a12b2a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 13 Renich Bon Ciric 2025-07-05 01:17:48 UTC
Thank you for your hard work, sir. :)

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2025-07-13 01:45:01 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-b8b2a12b2a (exim-4.98.2-2.el10_1) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.