Spec URL: https://v02460.fedorapeople.org/rust-serde_assert.spec SRPM URL: https://v02460.fedorapeople.org/rust-serde_assert-0.8.0-1.fc42.src.rpm Description: Testing library for serde Serialize and Deserialize implementations. Fedora Account System Username: v02460
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8493102 (succeeded) Review template: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2336533-rust-serde_assert/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08493102-rust-serde_assert/fedora-review/review.txt Please take a look if any issues were found. --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Package looks good to me! Can you add a link to the corresponding upstream commit that bumps the "claims" dependency as a comment to the spec file? https://github.com/Anders429/serde_assert/commit/f5ee1b6 === Package was generated with rust2rpm, simplifying the review. ✅ package contains only permissible content ✅ package builds and installs without errors on rawhide ✅ test suite is run and all unit tests pass ✅ latest version of the crate is packaged ✅ license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora ✅ license files are included with %license in %files ✅ package complies with Rust Packaging Guidelines Package APPROVED. === Recommended post-import rust-sig tasks: - set up package on release-monitoring.org: project: $crate homepage: https://crates.io/crates/$crate backend: crates.io version scheme: semantic version filter (*NOT* pre-release filter): alpha;beta;rc;pre distro: Fedora Package: rust-$crate - add @rust-sig with "commit" access as package co-maintainer (should happen automatically) - set bugzilla assignee overrides to @rust-sig (optional) - track package in koschei for all built branches (should happen automatically once rust-sig is co-maintainer)
Are you still interested in this package? If you need to import it, let me know, I will likely need to refresh the fedora-review + flag on this bug.
Thanks, I’d be glad if you could renew the approval
done!