Bug 2336609 - [8.0z backport] radosgw-admin lc process --bucket <bucket> doesn't remove objects if versioning is suspended
Summary: [8.0z backport] radosgw-admin lc process --bucket <bucket> doesn't remove obj...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: RGW
Version: 7.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 8.0z2
Assignee: Matt Benjamin (redhat)
QA Contact: Chaithra
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2319199
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-01-09 16:20 UTC by Bipin Kunal
Modified: 2025-03-06 14:21 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-19.2.0-84.el9cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Objects are now removed as per the lifecycle rules set when bucket versioning is suspended Previously, due to an error in the lifecycle code, the lifecycle process did not remove the objects if the bucket versioning was in the suspended state. As a result, the objects were still seen in the bucket listing. With this fix, the lifecycle code is fixed and now the lifecycle process removes objects as per the rules set and the objects are no longer listed in the bucket listing.
Clone Of: 2319199
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-03-06 14:21:35 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-10416 0 None None None 2025-01-09 16:21:21 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2025:2457 0 None None None 2025-03-06 14:21:38 UTC

Description Bipin Kunal 2025-01-09 16:20:56 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2319199 +++
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2025-03-06 14:21:35 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.0 security, bug fixes, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:2457
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.