Bug 2336849 - Review Request: kustomize - Customization of kubernetes YAML configurations
Summary: Review Request: kustomize - Customization of kubernetes YAML configurations
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Alejandro Sáez Morollón
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-01-09 23:28 UTC by Mikel Olasagasti Uranga
Modified: 2025-02-07 13:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
asm: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8497354 to 8497391 (349 bytes, patch)
2025-01-09 23:42 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8497391 to 8497397 (733 bytes, patch)
2025-01-09 23:48 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8497397 to 8498417 (833 bytes, patch)
2025-01-10 10:32 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2025-01-09 23:28:37 UTC
Spec URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/kustomize.spec
SRPM URL: https://mikel.olasagasti.info/tmp/fedora/kustomize-5.5.0-1.fc41.src.rpm
Description: Customization of kubernetes YAML configurations.
Fedora Account System Username: mikelo2

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-01-09 23:31:43 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8497354
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2336849-kustomize/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08497354-kustomize/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Fedora Review Service 2025-01-09 23:42:58 UTC
Created attachment 2065349 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8497354 to 8497391

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-01-09 23:43:00 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8497391
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2336849-kustomize/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08497391-kustomize/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-01-09 23:48:04 UTC
Created attachment 2065350 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8497391 to 8497397

Comment 7 Fedora Review Service 2025-01-09 23:48:05 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8497397
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2336849-kustomize/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08497397-kustomize/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 9 Fedora Review Service 2025-01-10 10:32:57 UTC
Created attachment 2065395 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8497397 to 8498417

Comment 10 Fedora Review Service 2025-01-10 10:32:59 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8498417
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2336849-kustomize/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08498417-kustomize/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 11 Alejandro Sáez Morollón 2025-02-07 13:55:05 UTC
This package uses go2rpm.

- [X] The specfile is sane.
- [X] License is correct
- [X] Builds successfully in mock
- [X] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review)
- [X] No relevant rpmlint errors
- [X] %check section passes
- [X] The latest version is packaged
- [X] `%goipath` is set correctly
- [X] Binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution
- [X] The package complies with the Packaging Guidelines.

Approved. Please remember to give privileges on the package to the Go SIG.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.