Bug 2338735 - Fedora 40 upgrade fails resulting in unbootable system
Summary: Fedora 40 upgrade fails resulting in unbootable system
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: lvm2
Version: 42
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: LVM and device-mapper development team
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-01-18 15:43 UTC by ochal.christophe@pm.me
Modified: 2026-06-08 16:13 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-06-08 16:13:37 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description ochal.christophe@pm.me 2025-01-18 15:43:29 UTC
I have a system where /home is on a raid 5 volume that is not detected at boot and not activated.

I can install fedora 40 and update packages just fine if I blacklist Lvm2 and stay on version 2.03.23-1.fc40 but updating lvm2 kills my system

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
update lvm2 to 2.03.25-fc40
reboot
Actual Results:  
no complete boot

Expected Results:  
Boot to desktop

lvmconfig 
  WARNING: Running as a non-root user. Functionality may be unavailable.
config {
}
local {
}
dmeventd {
}
activation {
}
global {
}
shell {
}
backup {
}
log {
}
allocation {
}
devices {
	scan_lvs=1
}

Comment 1 ochal.christophe@pm.me 2025-01-18 15:45:51 UTC
dnf config:

# see `man dnf.conf` for defaults and possible options

[main]
gpgcheck=True
installonly_limit=3
clean_requirements_on_remove=True
best=False
skip_if_unavailable=True
#exclude=lvm2*

Comment 2 ochal.christophe@pm.me 2025-01-19 15:24:08 UTC
I managed to work around most of my issue's, i suspect most stem from a lack of devicefiles, i'll investigate the failure to mount to mount the luks volume next weekend but it's probably unrelaated to lvm proper

Comment 3 ochal.christophe@pm.me 2025-02-02 10:45:23 UTC
did some more tests updating thesew packages render my /home unmountable'

Total download size: 3.0 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
(1/7): device-mapper-event-1.02.199-1.fc40.x86_ 212 kB/s |  33 kB     00:00    
(2/7): device-mapper-event-libs-1.02.199-1.fc40 182 kB/s |  31 kB     00:00    
(3/7): device-mapper-1.02.199-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm 701 kB/s | 136 kB     00:00    
(4/7): device-mapper-libs-1.02.199-1.fc40.x86_6 1.9 MB/s | 176 kB     00:00    
(5/7): lvm2-2.03.25-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm           6.0 MB/s | 1.5 MB     00:00    
(6/7): lvm2-dbusd-2.03.25-1.fc40.noarch.rpm     687 kB/s | 168 kB     00:00    
(7/7): lvm2-libs-2.03.25-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm      1.5 MB/s | 998 kB     00:00    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                           2.9 MB/s | 3.0 MB     00:01     

if i reboot after these updates i'm dropped into emergency mode and asked for my root password
doing vgchange -ay proerly activates my volume group and i can continue my boot process

If you require more information, let me know

Comment 4 Marian Csontos 2025-02-03 12:49:14 UTC
Hi, could you please upload/post `lvmdump -su`

Comment 5 ochal.christophe@pm.me 2025-02-07 19:39:32 UTC
The lvmdump is here: https://we.tl/t-eI6GFYqE9J

Comment 6 Zdenek Kabelac 2025-02-18 15:57:46 UTC
The thing to check - is the use of 'devicesfile'

If such file '/etc/lvm/devices/system.devices'
(and lvm.conf   use_devicesfile  is 1)

then this file needs to have listed devices used by system.

Unsure how your upgrade was made - there was the idea if the 'file' does NOT exist and you have lvm.conf  which now defaults to 1 for Fedora builds,  lvm2 will still go with 'filters'.

However if the upgrade process has created  'devicesfile'  and BUT  has NOT imported all currently visible  PVs  (with lvmdevices/vgimportdevices) - then you may possibly end with a system which will not see a PV  ( as it's not enlisted in  devicesfile).

Number of solutions -  remove devicesfile and set use_devicesfile=0 
Or simply import visible PV to your devicesfile.

Comment 7 ochal.christophe@pm.me 2025-02-23 09:35:06 UTC
(In reply to Zdenek Kabelac from comment #6)
> The thing to check - is the use of 'devicesfile'
> 
> If such file '/etc/lvm/devices/system.devices'
> (and lvm.conf   use_devicesfile  is 1)
> 
> then this file needs to have listed devices used by system.
> 
> Unsure how your upgrade was made - there was the idea if the 'file' does NOT
> exist and you have lvm.conf  which now defaults to 1 for Fedora builds, 
> lvm2 will still go with 'filters'.
> 
> However if the upgrade process has created  'devicesfile'  and BUT  has NOT
> imported all currently visible  PVs  (with lvmdevices/vgimportdevices) -
> then you may possibly end with a system which will not see a PV  ( as it's
> not enlisted in  devicesfile).
> 
> Number of solutions -  remove devicesfile and set use_devicesfile=0 
> Or simply import visible PV to your devicesfile.

This tracks with what I observed with the f40 installer I did notice this in lvm.conf:
 # Allow LVM LVs to be used as PVs. When enabled, LVM commands will
        # scan active LVs to look for other PVs. Caution is required to
        # avoid using PVs that belong to guest images stored on LVs.
        # When enabled, the LVs scanned should be restricted using the
        # devices file or the filter. This option does not enable autoactivation
        # of layered VGs, which requires editing LVM udev rules (see LVM_PVSCAN_ON_LVS.)
        # This configuration option has an automatic default value.
        # scan_lvs = 0


How do i work with layered VG's? I recall having done that years ago to work with with a mirroreed cache? googling LVM_PVSCAN_ON_LVS didn't provide more information

Comment 8 Aoife Moloney 2025-02-26 13:24:41 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 42 development cycle.
Changing version to 42.

Comment 9 Fedora Release Engineering 2026-05-06 12:04:32 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 42 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 42 on 2026-05-13.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
'version' of '42'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version. Note that the version field may be hidden.
Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see it.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 42 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.

Comment 10 Aoife Moloney 2026-06-08 16:13:37 UTC
Fedora Linux 42 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2026-05-27.

Fedora Linux 42 is no longer maintained, which means that it
will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we
are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora Linux
please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Note that the version
field may be hidden. Click the "Show advanced fields" button if you do not see
the version field.

If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against an
active release.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.