Bug 233889 - netatalk, netatalk-devel: unowned directories
netatalk, netatalk-devel: unowned directories
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: netatalk (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Martin Nagy
: EasyFix
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2007-03-25 12:56 EDT by Michael Schwendt
Modified: 2016-07-26 19:46 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: netatalk-2.0.3-17.fc9
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-25 04:35:12 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
diff against cvs (688 bytes, patch)
2008-02-23 12:48 EST, Michael Schwendt
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Michael Schwendt 2007-03-25 12:56:13 EDT
=> netatalk - 4:2.0.3-9.fc7.i386
/usr/lib/atalk

=> netatalk-devel - 4:2.0.3-9.fc7.i386
/usr/include/netatalk
Comment 1 Martin Nagy 2008-02-23 11:13:28 EST
Could please be more verbose in describing your problem?
Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2008-02-23 12:48:15 EST
Created attachment 295711 [details]
diff against cvs

The term "unowned directory" (or less commonly "orphaned
directory") is used in conjunction with packages that store
files in a directory, but don't include the directory itself.
When listing the list of files in the packages (e.g. with
"rpm -qlv ..." or rpmls from the UsefulScripts Wiki page),
you can see whether your package includes the "drwxr-xr-x"
entry for a directory and not just files within it.

For a long time, rpm created unowned directories with insufficient
file access permissions depending on root's umask. As another
problem, unowned directories are not removed when erasing a
package.

Finally, there are multiple ways to fix it. One is to use %dir
entries in the %files list. Another is to include directories
plus their contents recursively.
Comment 3 Martin Nagy 2008-02-25 04:35:12 EST
Thanks.
Fixed in netatalk-2.0.3-17.fc9

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.