Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 2339149

Summary: cephadm adoption playbook does not handle RGW hosts placement of older clusters with multiple subnets
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: John Fulton <johfulto>
Component: Ceph-AnsibleAssignee: Teoman ONAY <tonay>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Sayalee <saraut>
Severity: high Docs Contact: Rivka Pollack <rpollack>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.3CC: ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, gmeno, msaini, rpollack, saraut, tonay, tserlin
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 5.3z8   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-ansible-6.0.28.20-1.el8cp Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.The `Update the placement of radosgw hosts` task now completes as expected with multiple defined networks Previously, `networks` in the specification file would be considered a string, even when multiple networks were defined. As a result, the `Update the placement of radosgw hosts` `cephadm-adopt` task would fail when multiple subnets were defined in the `networks` field of the specification file. With this fix, multiple networks are ready as expected and the `cephadm-adopt` task completes successfully.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-02-13 19:23:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description John Fulton 2025-01-21 14:34:28 UTC
ceph-ansible's cephadm-adopt task 'Update the placement of radosgw hosts' failing when multiple subnets are defined.

Comment 1 Storage PM bot 2025-01-21 14:34:38 UTC
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.

Comment 2 John Fulton 2025-01-21 14:36:07 UTC
This bugzilla provides a way to have an errata. For the following reported jira issues:

  https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHCEPH-10442
  https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHCEPH-10418

Comment 3 John Fulton 2025-01-21 14:36:43 UTC
https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/7633

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2025-02-13 19:23:19 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.3 security and bug fix updates), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:1478