Bug 2339969 - cjdns: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42
Summary: cjdns: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: cjdns
Version: 42
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Stuart D Gathman
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2339589 2371694 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: F41FTBFS F42FTBFS PYTHON3.14 F43FTBFS F43FailsToInstall F44FailsToInstall, RAWHIDEFailsToInstall
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-01-22 19:15 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2025-09-08 09:34 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (32.00 KB, text/plain)
2025-01-22 19:15 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
root.log (32.00 KB, text/plain)
2025-01-22 19:15 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
state.log (1.62 KB, text/plain)
2025-01-22 19:15 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 19:15:00 UTC
cjdns failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f42

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=127938487


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix cjdns at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
cjdns will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 43,
cjdns will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/

Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 19:15:02 UTC
Created attachment 2068490 [details]
build.log

file build.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 19:15:03 UTC
Created attachment 2068491 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 19:15:05 UTC
Created attachment 2068492 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 20:48:15 UTC
*** Bug 2339589 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Aoife Moloney 2025-02-26 13:26:53 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 42 development cycle.
Changing version to 42.

Comment 6 Karolina Surma 2025-06-11 15:52:51 UTC
*** Bug 2371694 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Fedora Fails To Install 2025-06-20 19:50:57 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py
If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/

This package fails to install and maintainers are advised to take one of the following actions:

 - Fix this bug and close this bugzilla once the update makes it to the repository.
   (The same script that posted this comment will eventually close this bugzilla
   when the fixed package reaches the repository, so you don't have to worry about it.)

or

 - Move this bug to ASSIGNED if you plan on fixing this, but simply haven't done so yet.

or

 - Orphan the package if you no longer plan to maintain it.


If you do not take one of these actions, the process at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs will continue.
This package may be orphaned in 7+ weeks.
This is the first reminder (step 3) from the policy.

Don't hesitate to ask for help on https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/ if you are unsure how to fix this bug.

Comment 8 Miro Hrončok 2025-08-25 10:52:07 UTC
Stuart, you ASSIGNED this Bugzilla in June. What is the plan? The Beta Freeze of Fedora 43 starts tomorrow.

Comment 9 Stuart D Gathman 2025-08-31 16:49:18 UTC
Doing lots of trial builds.  Doing a non-rpm build of 22.1 to see if upstream has stopped using sodiumoxide.  I assume beta-freeze has already happened.

Comment 10 Miro Hrončok 2025-09-08 09:34:51 UTC
> I assume beta-freeze has already happened.

It did.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.