Bug 2340787 - llvm11: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42
Summary: llvm11: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: llvm11
Version: 42
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jens Petersen
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F42FTBFS 2380784 2381065 2381278
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-01-22 20:49 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2025-07-21 12:19 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (32.00 KB, text/plain)
2025-01-22 20:49 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
root.log (32.00 KB, text/plain)
2025-01-22 20:49 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
state.log (1.63 KB, text/plain)
2025-01-22 20:49 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 20:49:49 UTC
llvm11 failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f42

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128008340


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix llvm11 at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
llvm11 will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 43,
llvm11 will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/

Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 20:49:52 UTC
Created attachment 2070898 [details]
build.log

file build.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 20:49:54 UTC
Created attachment 2070899 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2025-01-22 20:49:55 UTC
Created attachment 2070900 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Aoife Moloney 2025-02-26 13:39:18 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 42 development cycle.
Changing version to 42.

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2025-07-21 12:19:02 UTC
I think it would be okay to retire llvm11 soon: so I don't intend to fix this really.

$ fedora-repoquery --all-archs 43 --whatrequires llvm11*
llvm11-11.1.0-14.fc41.i686 (fedora-rawhide)
llvm11-11.1.0-14.fc41.x86_64 (fedora-rawhide)
llvm11-devel-11.1.0-14.fc41.i686 (fedora-rawhide)
llvm11-devel-11.1.0-14.fc41.x86_64 (fedora-rawhide)
llvm11-doc-11.1.0-14.fc41.noarch (fedora-rawhide)
llvm11-11.1.0-14.fc41.aarch64 (fedora-rawhide-aarch64)
llvm11-devel-11.1.0-14.fc41.aarch64 (fedora-rawhide-aarch64)
llvm11-doc-11.1.0-14.fc41.noarch (fedora-rawhide-aarch64)
llvm11-11.1.0-14.fc41.ppc64le (fedora-rawhide-ppc64le)
llvm11-devel-11.1.0-14.fc41.ppc64le (fedora-rawhide-ppc64le)
llvm11-doc-11.1.0-14.fc41.noarch (fedora-rawhide-ppc64le)
llvm11-11.1.0-14.fc41.s390x (fedora-rawhide-s390x)
llvm11-devel-11.1.0-14.fc41.s390x (fedora-rawhide-s390x)
llvm11-doc-11.1.0-14.fc41.noarch (fedora-rawhide-s390x)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.