Bug 2342847
| Summary: | [8.0z2] Allow decoding of v1-v3 of RGWZoneGroupPlacementTier | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Soumya Koduri <skoduri> |
| Component: | RGW | Assignee: | Soumya Koduri <skoduri> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Madhavi Kasturi <mkasturi> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 8.0 | CC: | bhkaur, ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, mbenjamin, mkasturi, tserlin, vimishra |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | mkasturi:
needinfo+
|
| Target Release: | 8.0z2 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-19.2.0-73.el9cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
.Ceph Object Gateway clients can now read and decode new object structures correctly
Previously, due to a modification of the RGWZoneGroupPlacementTier, older versions of Ceph Object Gateway clients were not able to read or decode new object structures.
With this fix, the order and read structure in existing versions are corrected and Ceph Object Gateway services of older versions can now read and decode the new object manifest, as expected.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2025-03-06 14:21:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Soumya Koduri
2025-01-29 19:10:14 UTC
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 8.0 security, bug fixes, and enhancement updates), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2025:2457 |