Spec URL: http://support.sdformation.fr/dolibarr.spec SRPM URL: http://support.sdformation.fr/dolibarr-20.0.3-0.4.fc41.src.rpm Description: ERP and CRM software for small and medium companies or foundations Fedora Account System Username:prof33 this is my first package and I need a sponsor.
Cannot find any valid SRPM URL for this ticket. Common causes are: - You didn't specify `SRPM URL: ...` in the ticket description or any of your comments - The URL schema isn't HTTP or HTTPS - The SRPM package linked in your URL doesn't match the package name specified in the ticket summary --- This comment was created by the fedora-review-service https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
Fixed the summary in the bug title to match the one in the submitted spec file. You must submit the source RPM, not the “built” binary RPM. I’m not planning to take this review, but overall, at a glance, I see a lot of obsolete and/or specifically prohibited boilerplate in the spec file, and it’s going to be time-consuming for a reviewer to wade through all of that. I know that Fedora’s packaging guidelines, https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/, are a large document, but I think it would wise to spend some time studying the relevant sections and making an attempt to conform to current practices.
*** Bug 2343403 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 2343401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 2343399 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
PhP SIG may also be helpful: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/PHP See also: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/PHP/