Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 2343728

Summary:	[RGW] Delete bucket policy should return 204 instead of 200
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Anuchaithra <anrao>
Component:	RGW	Assignee:	Pritha Srivastava <prsrivas>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Anuchaithra <anrao>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:	Rivka Pollack <rpollack>
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.0	CC:	ceph-eng-bugs, cephqe-warriors, rpollack, tserlin
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	9.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ceph-20.1.0-26	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	.Delete bucket policy now returns correct status code Previously, the delete bucket policy operation returned HTTP status code `204`, instead of the correct `200` code. With this fix, the HTTP status code was corrected, and delete bucket policy now returns `200`, as expected.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2026-01-29 06:53:36 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	2388233

Description Anuchaithra 2025-02-04 11:20:30 UTC

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2026-01-29 06:53:36 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 9.0 Security and Enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1536