Bug 2344125 - Review Request: rust-gst-plugin-uriplaylistbin - GStreamer playlist playback plugin
Summary: Review Request: rust-gst-plugin-uriplaylistbin - GStreamer playlist playback ...
Keywords:
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Fabio Valentini
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://crates.io/crates/gst-plugin-u...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-02-06 05:06 UTC by Yaakov Selkowitz
Modified: 2025-03-22 17:27 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
decathorpe: fedora-review?


Attachments (Terms of Use)
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8612384 to 8772332 (1.07 KB, patch)
2025-03-17 02:16 UTC, Fedora Review Service
no flags Details | Diff

Description Yaakov Selkowitz 2025-02-06 05:06:04 UTC
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/rust-gst-plugin-uriplaylistbin.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/rust-gst-plugin-uriplaylistbin-0.13.2-1.fc42.src.rpm
Description: GStreamer playlist playback plugin
Fedora Account System Username: yselkowitz

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-02-06 05:15:44 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8612384
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2344125-rust-gst-plugin-uriplaylistbin/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08612384-rust-gst-plugin-uriplaylistbin/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Fabio Valentini 2025-03-15 18:22:26 UTC
Version 0.13.2 doesn't contain the LICENSE file for the MPL-2.0 license, which is (if I'm reading the license terms correctly) a requirement. This seems to have been fixed with version 0.13.5, so please update to that.

Additionally, the same questions about 1) whether the Provides for the upstream project name were dropped accidentally and 2) whether you want to package now and enable tests later apply here, too.

Comment 3 Yaakov Selkowitz 2025-03-17 01:57:44 UTC
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #2)
> Version 0.13.2 doesn't contain the LICENSE file for the MPL-2.0 license,
> which is (if I'm reading the license terms correctly) a requirement. This
> seems to have been fixed with version 0.13.5, so please update to that.

It didn't happen by itself. :-)

> Additionally, the same questions about 1) whether the Provides for the
> upstream project name were dropped accidentally and 2) whether you want to
> package now and enable tests later apply here, too.

As do my answers.

Comment 4 Yaakov Selkowitz 2025-03-17 01:57:56 UTC
Spec URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/rust-gst-plugin-uriplaylistbin.spec
SRPM URL: https://yselkowitz.fedorapeople.org/rust-gst-plugin-uriplaylistbin-0.13.5-1.fc43.src.rpm
Description: GStreamer playlist playback plugin
Fedora Account System Username: yselkowitz

Comment 5 Fedora Review Service 2025-03-17 02:16:23 UTC
Created attachment 2080488 [details]
The .spec file difference from Copr build 8612384 to 8772332

Comment 6 Fedora Review Service 2025-03-17 02:16:25 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8772332
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2344125-rust-gst-plugin-uriplaylistbin/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08772332-rust-gst-plugin-uriplaylistbin/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 7 Fabio Valentini 2025-03-22 17:27:32 UTC
Package looks mostly good now except for the two points raised earlier
(disabled tests could be enabled now, and Provides are missing, still not sure whether intentional or not).


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.