Bug 2344219 (CVE-2025-22866) - CVE-2025-22866 crypto/internal/nistec: golang: Timing sidechannel for P-256 on ppc64le in crypto/internal/nistec
Summary: CVE-2025-22866 crypto/internal/nistec: golang: Timing sidechannel for P-256 o...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: CVE-2025-22866
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Product Security DevOps Team
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2344501 2344502 2344503 2344504 2350500
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-02-06 17:01 UTC by OSIDB Bzimport
Modified: 2025-05-15 08:28 UTC (History)
142 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2025:3922 0 None None None 2025-04-15 17:24:41 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2025:4810 0 None None None 2025-05-12 15:06:28 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2025:7326 0 None None None 2025-05-13 10:36:49 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2025:7466 0 None None None 2025-05-13 15:56:43 UTC

Description OSIDB Bzimport 2025-02-06 17:01:18 UTC 
Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recovery of the private key when P-256 is used in any well known protocols.
Comment 4 Debarshi Ray 2025-03-06 14:54:35 UTC 
After a little bit of Git archaeology, I found that this was fixed in Go 1.22.12 with:
https://github.com/golang/go/commit/0cc45e7ca668b103

... and in Go 1.23.5 with:
https://github.com/golang/go/commit/6644ed63b1e6ccc1
Comment 5 Debarshi Ray 2025-03-06 14:55:39 UTC 
(In reply to Debarshi Ray from comment #4)
> ... and in Go 1.23.5 with:
> https://github.com/golang/go/commit/6644ed63b1e6ccc1

Sorry, this was 1.23.6.
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2025-04-15 17:24:33 UTC 
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.5 for RHEL 8

Via RHSA-2025:3922 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:3922
Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2025-05-12 15:06:17 UTC 
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 for RHEL 9

Via RHSA-2025:4810 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:4810
Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2025-05-13 10:36:39 UTC 
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9

Via RHSA-2025:7326 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:7326
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2025-05-13 15:56:34 UTC 
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Via RHSA-2025:7466 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:7466
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.