Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ Your package (PySolFC) Fails To Install in Fedora 43: can't install PySolFC: - nothing provides tcl < 1:9 needed by PySolFC-3.2.0-3.fc43.noarch - nothing provides tk < 1:9 needed by PySolFC-3.2.0-3.fc43.noarch If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-43-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install PySolFC P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages Thanks!
Hi all! I'm assigning this bug to me. How do you propose requiring tcl8 and tk8 [as opposed to tcl9/tk9]? "tcl = 1:8 ; tk = 1:8"
Hi, seems to me that that BuildRequires: tcl-devel < 1:9 works [1] , but Requires: tcl < 1:9 don't mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --install tcl8 tk8, works, so Requires: tcl8 tk8 should work anyway did you test with tcl / tk 9 ? why doesn't work with tcl / tk 9 = [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/expect/c/7e912dbebb5b31f3e35291d3ebfcfe342006ba72?branch=rawhide
FEDORA-2025-0dc149773c (PySolFC-3.2.0-4.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-0dc149773c
FEDORA-2025-0dc149773c (PySolFC-3.2.0-4.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Update: After testing "Fedora-Workstation-Live-Rawhide-20250219.n.0.x86_64.iso" in qemu-kvm it seems like the new PySolFC requires all of "tcl8" , "tk8" , "tcl" , and "tk" . Moreover, the "*8" versions of tcl and tk are loaded by PySolFC based on /proc/.../maps . the "*9" versions are not loaded. cpython3 's "tkinter" .so is also loaded.
Hi, I don't use rawhide , I already have one vm with Fedora 42 , I can check it there , but maybe we should go with tcl/tck 8 like expect package but IDK https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/expect/c/7e912dbebb5b31f3e35291d3ebfcfe342006ba72?branch=rawhide https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/expect/blob/rawhide/f/expect-5.45.4-tclsh8.patch
FEDORA-2025-6cc5beeeb7 (PySolFC-3.2.0-5.fc43) has been submitted as an update to Fedora 43. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-6cc5beeeb7
FEDORA-2025-6cc5beeeb7 (PySolFC-3.2.0-5.fc43) has been pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.