Bug 234626 – Why not just use the upstream download?

This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2017-10-23 It is expected to last about 30 minutes

Bug 234626 - Why not just use the upstream download?

Summary:	Why not just use the upstream download?

Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	rssowl (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Anthony Green
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2007-03-30 13:50 EDT by Andrew Overholt
Modified:	2008-01-03 14:22 EST (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-01-03 14:22:03 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Andrew Overholt 2007-03-30 13:50:12 EDT

The upstream source download contains some jars but nothing we can't distribute.
 Can we just use the upstream source drop and make sure we symlink all the jars?
 That way we could verify md5sums and wouldn't have to worry about cleaning it.

Comment 1 Anthony Green 2008-01-03 14:22:03 EST

RSSOwl is no longer part of Fedora due to dependency licensing problems.  I'm
closing this with WONTFIX.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.