Bug 2346665 - Review Request: python-fastrlock - Fast, re-entrant optimistic lock implemented in Cython
Summary: Review Request: python-fastrlock - Fast, re-entrant optimistic lock implement...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Benson Muite
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/scoder/fastrlock
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-02-19 19:58 UTC by Tom.Rix
Modified: 2025-03-29 12:30 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2025-03-29 12:30:09 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
benson_muite: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Aaron Linder 2025-02-19 20:05:15 UTC
@trix okay I signed up for updates. let it let me know what to do.

Comment 2 Tom.Rix 2025-02-19 20:32:56 UTC
(In reply to Aaron Linder from comment #1)
> @trix okay I signed up for updates. let it let me know what to do.

This is just a step to get cupy going, when i have that packaged up, i'll point you at it to test.

Comment 3 Aaron Linder 2025-02-19 21:11:23 UTC
Okay thanks, CuPy is one of the requirements for a Video MP4 based video capture of rPPG signal which is for biosignal capturing process.

I wasn't able to build from source, but once the Wheel is available, or the rpm package, I will put some notes on here for reference

https://docs.cupy.dev/en/stable/install.html#building-cupy-for-rocm-from-source

It's still an experimental system, but I am going to use it for capturing rPPG signals from this library

https://github.com/phuselab/PyVHR

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2025-02-20 15:37:59 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8675782
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2346665-python-fastrlock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08675782-python-fastrlock/fedora-review/review.txt

Please take a look if any issues were found.


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Tom.Rix 2025-03-01 15:38:43 UTC
Is there something I need to do ?

Comment 6 Aaron Linder 2025-03-01 18:38:10 UTC
@tom.rix

I still would like to get CuPy wheel working, during the week I ended up with a different optimization, I had to get something out the door because of deadline.  I am still very interested in this accelerator working.

Comment 7 Aaron Linder 2025-03-02 06:58:57 UTC
@tom.rix

Okay I solve the problem. Here is my installation

podman run -it --device=/dev/kdf --device=/dev/dri --group-add video cupy/cupy-rocm

Then 

~$python3
>>>import numpy as np
>>>import cupy as cp


Unfortunately there is no container to build from source and it seems a little tricky for me at the moment to build from source.

Comment 8 Aaron Linder 2025-03-02 07:00:46 UTC
(In reply to Aaron Linder from comment #7)
> @tom.rix
> 
> Okay I solve the problem. Here is my installation
> 
> podman run -it --device=/dev/kdf --device=/dev/dri --group-add video
> cupy/cupy-rocm
> 
> Then 
> 
> ~$python3
> >>>import numpy as np
> >>>import cupy as cp
> 
> 
> Unfortunately there is no container to build from source and it seems a
> little tricky for me at the moment to build from source.

this is only for ROCm 5.0~~

Comment 9 Benson Muite 2025-03-08 13:39:32 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "*No copyright* MIT
     License". 20 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/fedora-packaging/python-fastrlock/2346665-
     python-fastrlock/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-
     packages, /usr/lib64/python3.13
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-fastrlock-0.8.3-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm
          python-fastrlock-0.8.3-1.fc43.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpbzje191v')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/fastrlock/__init__.pxd
python-fastrlock.src: E: spelling-error ('cimport', '%description -l en_US cimport -> comport, import, c import')
python-fastrlock.src: E: spelling-error ('cython', '%description -l en_US cython -> python, Python')
python-fastrlock.src: E: spelling-error ('cimports', '%description -l en_US cimports -> comports, imports, c imports')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cimport', '%description -l en_US cimport -> comport, import, c import')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cython', '%description -l en_US cython -> python, Python')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cimports', '%description -l en_US cimports -> comports, imports, c imports')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: W: no-documentation
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 1 warnings, 7 filtered, 7 badness; has taken 0.7 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/fastrlock/__init__.pxd
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cimport', '%description -l en_US cimport -> comport, import, c import')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cython', '%description -l en_US cython -> python, Python')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cimports', '%description -l en_US cimports -> comports, imports, c imports')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: W: no-documentation
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 1 warnings, 3 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.2 s 



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
python3-fastrlock: /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/fastrlock/rlock.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/f/fastrlock/fastrlock-0.8.3.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 4af6734d92eaa3ab4373e6c9a1dd0d5ad1304e172b1521733c6c3b3d73c8fa5d
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 4af6734d92eaa3ab4373e6c9a1dd0d5ad1304e172b1521733c6c3b3d73c8fa5d


Requires
--------
python3-fastrlock (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    python(abi)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
python3-fastrlock:
    python-fastrlock
    python3-fastrlock
    python3-fastrlock(x86-64)
    python3.13-fastrlock
    python3.13dist(fastrlock)
    python3dist(fastrlock)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2346665
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Python, C/C++, Generic
Disabled plugins: Ocaml, SugarActivity, R, Java, fonts, PHP, Perl, Haskell
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comments:
a) Consider packaging README.rst as documentation
b) Can tests be run:
https://github.com/scoder/fastrlock/blob/master/tox.ini#L21
c) Maybe helpful to do a build on koji
d) Is the empty file needed:
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/fastrlock/__init__.pxd

Comment 10 Tom.Rix 2025-03-08 16:17:04 UTC
Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/python-fastrlock.spec
SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/python-fastrlock-0.8.3-1.fc42.src.rpm

A lot of changes to get the test source and use them.
Testing results i get from mock are

============================= test session starts ==============================
platform linux -- Python 3.13.2, pytest-8.3.4, pluggy-1.5.0
cachedir: .tox/py313/.pytest_cache
rootdir: /builddir/build/BUILD/python-fastrlock-0.8.3-build/fastrlock-0.8.3
collected 13 items
fastrlock/tests/test_rlock.py .............
============================== 13 passed in 0.14s ==============================

Readme added.

__init__.pxd, is part of the pypi/pip package

$ ls ~/.local/lib/python3.13/site-packages/fastrlock
__init__.pxd  __init__.py  _lock.pxi  __pycache__  rlock.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so  rlock.pxd  rlock.pyx

and is not doing any harm, so I left it.
If you feel strongly about it, i can %exclude it,

Comment 11 Aaron Linder 2025-03-08 19:45:55 UTC
Okay it looks good, one step closer to building CuPy for ROCm for consumer cards!

Comment 12 Benson Muite 2025-03-24 12:21:46 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "*No copyright* Creative
     Commons CC0 1.0", "*No copyright* MIT License". 19 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/fedora-packaging/reviews/python-fastrlock/2346665-python-
     fastrlock/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/python3.13,
     /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 5669 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-fastrlock-0.8.3-1.fc43.x86_64.rpm
          python-fastrlock-0.8.3-1.fc43.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpbxicwzbn')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/fastrlock/__init__.pxd
python-fastrlock.src: E: spelling-error ('cimport', '%description -l en_US cimport -> comport, import, c import')
python-fastrlock.src: E: spelling-error ('cython', '%description -l en_US cython -> python, Python')
python-fastrlock.src: E: spelling-error ('cimports', '%description -l en_US cimports -> comports, imports, c imports')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cimport', '%description -l en_US cimport -> comport, import, c import')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cython', '%description -l en_US cython -> python, Python')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cimports', '%description -l en_US cimports -> comports, imports, c imports')
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 0 warnings, 7 filtered, 7 badness; has taken 0.6 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.7.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 1

python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/fastrlock/__init__.pxd
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cimport', '%description -l en_US cimport -> comport, import, c import')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cython', '%description -l en_US cython -> python, Python')
python3-fastrlock.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('cimports', '%description -l en_US cimports -> comports, imports, c imports')
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 0 warnings, 3 filtered, 4 badness; has taken 0.2 s 



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
python3-fastrlock: /usr/lib64/python3.13/site-packages/fastrlock/rlock.cpython-313-x86_64-linux-gnu.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/scoder/fastrlock/archive/v0.8.3.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 8cf3898b945c2f44eeb52ffce57b91104e89752f7b01345c975fdfbbaa7c38c6
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 8cf3898b945c2f44eeb52ffce57b91104e89752f7b01345c975fdfbbaa7c38c6


Requires
--------
python3-fastrlock (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    python(abi)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)



Provides
--------
python3-fastrlock:
    python-fastrlock
    python3-fastrlock
    python3-fastrlock(x86-64)
    python3.13-fastrlock
    python3.13dist(fastrlock)
    python3dist(fastrlock)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2346665
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Python
Disabled plugins: SugarActivity, PHP, R, Perl, Java, fonts, Haskell, Ocaml, C/C++
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comments:
a) Please change
Source:         %{url}/archive/v0.8.3.tar.gz
to
Source:         %{url}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
See packaging guidelines for how to reference source

b) Koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=130690479

c) Approved, please fix (a) before import.
d) Review of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354311 would be appreciated if time allows.

Comment 13 Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions 2025-03-24 14:14:30 UTC
The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fastrlock


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.