Bug 234837 - krb5-auth-dialog not renewing ticket
krb5-auth-dialog not renewing ticket
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 187485
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: krb5-auth-dialog (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Christopher Aillon
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2007-04-02 10:36 EDT by Frederic Medery
Modified: 2009-02-11 15:00 EST (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2009-02-11 15:00:58 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Frederic Medery 2007-04-02 10:36:32 EDT
Description of problem:
After entering my password in the krb5-auth-dialog, I did a klist and the ticket
is not renewed. I had to use kinit to renew the krb5 ticket

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:
ticket not renewed

Expected results:
krb5 ticket renew (just like a kinit -R)

Additional info:
In RHEL4 the screensaver password renewed the ticket It is not the case with RHEL5.
Comment 1 Petter Urkedal 2007-04-30 03:44:11 EDT
I think the problem may be with the dates of the renewal.  Today, may ticket
cache contained a ticket for Friday.  On first renewal attempt, I got a ticket
for Saturday, which is two days ago.  After kdestroy and a new attept I got a
ticket which would be valid only if I could re-live yesterday backwards:

    Ticket cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_XX
    Default principal: XX@XX

    Valid starting     Expires            Service principal
    04/30/07 09:16:56  04/29/07 09:50:04  krbtgt/XX@XX

    Kerberos 4 ticket cache: /tmp/tktXX
    klist: You have no tickets cached

I decided not to try that, so I used kinit instead, but I'm looking forward to a
more realistic auth dialog.
Comment 2 J. Bruce Fields 2008-09-02 11:06:12 EDT
This is clearly a duplicate of #187485.  (It may just be my lack of bugzilla skills, but I don't see the right way to mark this as a duplicate.)
Comment 3 Patrick C. F. Ernzer 2009-02-11 15:00:58 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 187485 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.