Bug 2349037 - Unretirement Review Request: golang-github-gookit-color - Terminal color rendering tool library
Summary: Unretirement Review Request: golang-github-gookit-color - Terminal color rend...
Keywords:
Status: RELEASE_PENDING
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mikel Olasagasti Uranga
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2340391
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-02-28 16:05 UTC by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
Modified: 2025-06-12 11:13 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: ---
Embargoed:
mikel: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Fedora Pagure releng issue 12776 0 None None None 2025-06-12 11:13:15 UTC

Description Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2025-02-28 16:05:07 UTC
Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-gookit-color/golang-github-gookit-color.spec
SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-gookit-color/golang-github-gookit-color-1.5.4-1.fc43.src.rpm
Description: Terminal color rendering library, supporting 8/16 colors, 256 colors, RGB color
rendering output, supporting Print/Sprintf methods.
Fedora Account System Username: rathann

This is an unretirement review request. Original package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-gookit-color

Comment 1 Fedora Review Service 2025-02-28 16:12:12 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/8710287
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2349037-golang-github-gookit-color/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08710287-golang-github-gookit-color/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-gookit-color
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names
- Documentation size is 2307825 bytes in 47 files. 
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_documentation

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 2 Mikel Olasagasti Uranga 2025-06-09 15:10:06 UTC
Golang Package Review
==============

This package was generated using go2rpm, which simplifies the review.

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


- [x] The latest version is packaged or packaging an earlier version is justified.
- [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct identifiers.
- [x] The package builds successfully in mock.
- [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review).
- [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors.
- [x] The package runs tests in %check.
- [x] `%goipath` is set correctly.
- [-] The package's binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution. (Some Go projects include utility binaries with very generic names)
- [-] There are no `%{_bindir}/*` wildcards in %files. (go2rpm includes these by default)
- [x] The package does not use `%gometa -f` if it has dependents that still build for %ix86.
- [x] The package complies with the Golang and general Packaging Guidelines.

Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following:

- [ ] Add the package to release-monitoring.org
- [ ] Give go-sig privileges (at least commit) on the package
- [ ] Close the review bug by referencing its ID in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket.
- [ ] Consider configuring Packit service to help with maintenance

Thanks!

Comment 3 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2025-06-12 11:13:16 UTC
Thanks for the review, unretirement request ticket created.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.