Bug 2349452 - python-astdoc fails to build with Python 3.14: 3 doctests fail, e.g.: Expected: <ast.Name object at 0x...> Got: Name(id='int', ctx=Load())
Summary: python-astdoc fails to build with Python 3.14: 3 doctests fail, e.g.: Expecte...
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-astdoc
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Davide Cavalca
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2371800 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: PYTHON3.14 F43FTBFS, RAWHIDEFTBFS F43FailsToInstall, RAWHIDEFailsToInstall 2342559
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2025-03-03 09:16 UTC by Karolina Surma
Modified: 2025-06-11 16:39 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Karolina Surma 2025-03-03 09:16:26 UTC
python-astdoc fails to build with Python 3.14.0a5.

_____________________ [doctest] astdoc.ast._iter_defaults ______________________
294 
295 Yields:
296     ast.expr | None: The default values for the parameters, or None
297     for parameters that do not have a default value.
298 
299 Examples:
300     >>> import ast
301     >>> src = "def func(a, b=2, c=3): pass"
302     >>> node = ast.parse(src).body[0]
303     >>> list(_iter_defaults(node))  # doctest: +ELLIPSIS
Expected:
    [None, <ast.Constant object at 0x...>, <ast.Constant object at 0x...>]
Got:
    [None, Constant(value=2, kind=None), Constant(value=3, kind=None)]

/builddir/build/BUILD/python-astdoc-1.0.0-build/astdoc-1.0.0/src/astdoc/ast.py:303: DocTestFailure
____________________ [doctest] astdoc.ast._iter_parameters _____________________
251     positional-only, positional-or-keyword, keyword-only, or variable).
252 
253 Examples:
254     >>> import ast
255     >>> src = "def func(a, b: int, *args, c: str, d=5, **kwargs): pass"
256     >>> node = ast.parse(src).body[0]
257     >>> args = list(_iter_parameters(node))
258     >>> args[0]
259     ('a', None, <_ParameterKind.POSITIONAL_OR_KEYWORD: 1>)
260     >>> args[1]  # doctest: +ELLIPSIS
Expected:
    ('b', <ast.Name object at 0x...>, <_ParameterKind.POSITIONAL_OR_KEYWORD: 1>)
Got:
    ('b', Name(id='int', ctx=Load()), <_ParameterKind.POSITIONAL_OR_KEYWORD: 1>)

/builddir/build/BUILD/python-astdoc-1.0.0-build/astdoc-1.0.0/src/astdoc/ast.py:260: DocTestFailure
_____________________ [doctest] astdoc.ast.get_assign_type _____________________
207         to extract the type annotation.
208 
209 Returns:
210     ast.expr | None: The type annotation of the assignment node if found,
211         otherwise None.
212 
213 Examples:
214     >>> import ast
215     >>> node = ast.parse("x: int = 1").body[0]
216     >>> get_assign_type(node)  # doctest: +ELLIPSIS
Expected:
    <ast.Name object at 0x...>
Got:
    Name(id='int', ctx=Load())

/builddir/build/BUILD/python-astdoc-1.0.0-build/astdoc-1.0.0/src/astdoc/ast.py:216: DocTestFailure

=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED src/astdoc/ast.py::astdoc.ast._iter_defaults
FAILED src/astdoc/ast.py::astdoc.ast._iter_parameters
FAILED src/astdoc/ast.py::astdoc.ast.get_assign_type
======================== 3 failed, 389 passed in 2.65s =========================

https://docs.python.org/3.14/whatsnew/3.14.html

For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.14/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08693200-python-astdoc/

For all our attempts to build python-astdoc with Python 3.14, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.14/package/python-astdoc/

Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr.
You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.14:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.14/

Let us know here if you have any questions.

Python 3.14 is planned to be included in Fedora 43.
To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with all pre-releases of Python 3.14.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires),
so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon.

We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best,
but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.

Comment 1 Karolina Surma 2025-06-11 15:56:09 UTC
*** Bug 2371800 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.